Fatcow Icon
Crouch resorts to bigotry in attempt to defend Rice
Jan 03, 2013 | 2026 views | 4 4 comments | 3 3 recommendations | email to a friend | print

To the Editor,

Stanley Crouch’s column in The Robesonian on Jan. 1 reeks of racism and anti-white bigotry. His claim that Republicans found Susan Rice unqualified because she is a black female lacks truthfulness, profundity, and, worst of all, evidence. He even invokes and besmirches the names of Sarah Palin and Andrew Breitbart. The former because she dares to be a conservative who served in elective office and speaks her mind and the latter accusing him of fraud, but once again with no probative evidence. He only accomplishes showing his prejudice against conservatives, because they disagree with him.

He claims that Republicans criticized Ms. Rice only because she is a black female. His assertion is the charge and the evidence all wrapped into one. It’s a position that liberals can be counted on to take every time something happens they don’t like. It must be because of race and/or gender. It can’t be because the facts support a contrary conclusion.

Ms. Rice fell on her proverbial sword long before she withdrew from the nomination for Secretary of State. She fell on her sword when she agreed to go on national television fives times and lie, or play dumb, for the Obama administration. Sure, she says she was given her talking points. However, she ostensibly didn’t question the talking points that most Americans knew or suspected was wrong. The evidence since her ill-fated television appearances shows that members of the Obama administration and the State Department knew that the talking points claiming that the tragedy in Benghazi was due to an anti-Muslim video that caused a “spontaneous crowd” to attack our embassy and kill four Americans was wrong. In short, Susan Rice was willing to be a mouthpiece with no compunction to think for herself.

Lastly, his assertion that Republicans are conclusively racist and bigoted because of their rejection of Susan Rice, based on her gender and race, ignores the preponderance of the evidence. He failed to mention Condoleezza Rice, a black female, was appointed to the position of Secretary of State by a Republican. Condolezza Rice is still admired and respected by Republicans today because of her honesty and competence, not her gender or race.

John Foster

Atlanta



Comments
(4)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
BBBD
|
January 03, 2013
I'm glad to see someone else hated that column as much as I did.
sagehopper
|
January 03, 2013
Crouch suffers from what many liberals suffer from. That is, a dual standard. Rice knew withi n two hours, as did her bosses, that that was a terrorist attack in Benghazi, but insisted on toeing the story line several times, lieng all the while. She alsoo knew that the "movie" had nothing to do with the attack, and insisted on saying it anyway..That, is reason to not believe what she says, nad not want her in a position of trust, and power. Her race had nothing to do with it..
ReallyRobeson?
|
January 04, 2013
Amen from a Democrat. A lot of us want to know about this issue as well. I don't care what her gender or race is, I do care that she's a liar. If she did as she was ordered, then I want whoever gave the order to stand up and take responsibility.
ROSSisRIGHT
|
January 06, 2013
Racism doesn't exist anymore. It's a figment of imagination by a person losing an argument.

Obama is responsible for trying to get it to have a comeback.
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: