Fatcow Icon
Fire departments fail public if they skip on automatic aid
Dec 12, 2011 | 1912 views | 11 11 comments | 14 14 recommendations | email to a friend | print

To the Editor,

Recently there was a meeting of the Robeson County Fire Chiefs Association, which was created to be a voice of leadership for fire protection in Robeson County. As most everyone knows, fire departments in Robeson County are primarily volunteer. A few departments have a “paid per call” status, and as far as I know only one department is considered “career.” The majority are volunteer.

The reason for the meeting was to discuss a department’s request to increase the “automatic aid” being dispatched by Robeson County 911 center. This was requested due to the increase of manpower present on the scene of a working structure fire. The National Institute of Standards and Technology during different simulations, showed that an increase of manpower on scene of a “working” structure fire, actually increased the chances of an effective rescue of a trapped civilian. It also decreased the likelihood of an injury to or death of a firefighter.

The department receiving automatic aid would also receive extra credit with North Carolina Department of Insurance, which lowers the cost of insurance premiums. The fire department of any fire district should do everything possible to improve its rating. We fail horribly if we don’t.

My challenge to you, the taxpayer, is to call your local fire department and speak to the fire chief. Demand to know if they were for the improvements or not.

There are 32 or 33 individual fire districts in Robeson County. Of those departments, only 23 departments were present at the meeting. Only nine fire departments voted for the increase of automatic aid. There were 14 departments that voted against.

It’s time for the standards in Robeson County to be raised. To those nine fire departments that voted yes, I commend you for standing up and trying to improve yourselves. Continue to set the level high.

Eddie Cox

Fire chief

Northwoods Fire Department



Comments
(11)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
TooMuchAtOnce
|
December 21, 2011
@ SpeakUrMind... I've read Chief Cox's letter over a few more times, and I just don't understand how you gather that he was "downing" other Fire Chiefs or Departments. It seems to me he was simply advising the public, who otherwise would not have had any knowledge to, what occurred at the meeting. Maybe your take on the letter was negative due to your own beliefs. You obviously believe responding to a reported structure fire in a neighbor's fire district is overkill. You also must believe that a department with four pumper/tankers needs to buy another one to be in compliance with ISO structure fire response standards. Automatic AID comes from OTHER departments, not your own! You also must believe that what happens in a meeting should stay out of the public forum. Your defensive posture suggests that you weren't prepared for the public to find out your opinions on response standards. And now that they may find out, you seem angry that doing and saying what is best for the citizens we serve, trumps the "this is how we've always done it" mentality, or "what happens in meetings concerning taxpapers should stay behind closed doors" attitude, or "that's just too many calls to have to respond to" opinion.

If you felt so strongly against this proposed change, you should welcome any taxpayers in your fire district to call you and ask how you voted, and why you voted against the changes. If you really felt it was a waste of money and could argue that point, then the taxpayer YOU serve, should be happy with your answer.

I personally would have a hard time understanding why the Fire Chief of the fire department I pay taxes to, would hesitate to get more able-bodied firefighters, more equipment, and more water to my home if it were on fire, while at the same time saving me money on my homeowners insurance. The extra money that would be spent in fuel, that the taxpayer provides, by running 75-100 more fire calls per year, would by far be a drop in the bucket compared to the combined decrease in insurance premiums that each taxpayer in the district would enjoy,with a little EXTRA work from the VOLUNTEERS!

I happen to have an education, but it isn't even needed to understand the common sense approaches concerning this topic from the TAXPAYER point of view, like, more is better, more is safer, and more is cheaper!

I appreciate the service you give to your fire department and the citizens in its district, and it is perfectly ok to have a difference of opinion with anyone, which is what makes this country so great. Even voicing that different opinion in the form of a vote is a privelege, one that you were able to get. But when Chief Cox expressed his opinion by writing a letter to the editor, he did so in a professional way. He didn't call anyone out specifically, he didn't "downgrade", as you called it in your response, any volunteer firefighters at all, and he didn't suggest that anyone reading his letter attempt to oust any Fire Chief against the change. You even went so far as to call him childish!?!

You sir, by suggesting he step down for standing up for what he believes in a tactful way, and for being so against a change that would benefit the residents of our county, seem out of touch with reality in general and with the fire service. The saying goes, "a guilty conscious needs no accuser." Chief Cox didn't accuse anyone of anything, he only stated the results of the vote. I wonder what you are guilty of...based off of your response, I come name a few that come to mind, but I will take the high road and not "downgrade" you. I personally think a public apology to Chief Cox would be the ADULT thing to do. Be safe.

@ Chief Cox

Thanks for putting your name out there and standing up for a change that would benefit the residents of our county. Yes it would require more blood, sweat, and tears from the county fire departments, but it would all be in the name of SERVICE to our fellow man.

And, just to speak on behalf of most of the rationale residents of the Northwoods fire district, I don't think you will be getting any phone calls requesting you step down for trying to save us money during tough economic times, and for wanting to have MORE than enough resources at our homes in the event of a fire. THANKS for your service and be safe.
FireChief700
|
December 21, 2011


Need Assessment for Structure Fires







In Robeson County one of the most common types of structure fires dispatched is single wide mobile homes. Lets examine the man power needed for one of these fires. A fire department rolls on to the scene of a 70 foot by 14 foot wide single wide mobile home. 50% involved in fire with or with out a person believed to be inside. Fire department lays two 1 ¾ attack lines on the ground. Here is the man power that is needed.



1 Incident commander

1 Pump operator

4 FF’s two on each attack line

2 FF’s RIC or safety line you pick the term you use

2 FF’s to perform ventilation (set up fan, open windows or doors, or open roof)

1 FF’s for water supply, tanker operation

2 FF’s to perform a primary search for occupants

1 FF to perform rehab.

2 FF’s to perform overhaul



Now after an average of ten minutes of physical work wearing an air pack the 4 FF’s on attack lines and 2 FF’s performing a primary search will be out of air so it will take 6 FF’s to replace the first in crews.



6 FF’s replace first in crews.



22 FF’s needed Total.





Now the above is only the number of fire fighters that are needed for a fire that actually goes for more than ten minutes. Most structure fires the average time on scene for 50% involvement is 1 to 2 hours. For every ten to fifteen minutes of SCBA or Firefighting time (working time) you have to double your man power. Based on the manpower study listed above you will need a minimum of 22 people if the fire doesn’t go past fifteen minutes. As you are aware most departments day or nights can not put that many firefighters on the scene with three departments together and certainly not for at least 20 minutes after the first initial page.





We have got to get out of the old way of thinking and start looking out for our firefihgters and the citizens. In the words of Chief Billy Goldfeder " You need 20 firefighters responding on first alarm on an unconfirmed structure fire".



Can it be done with less manpower? the answer is yes Can it be done safely with less manpower the answer is NO! So who is responsiable if something goes wrong and someone dies or is hurt? The answer is the FIRE CHIEF!





Jeanie West

Differentpov
|
December 21, 2011
In today's climate automatic mutual aid or alarm assignments have become a standard throughout the fire service nationwide.  This affords a multitude of enhancements to everyone involved. The primary function of any fire department is to preserve life and then property.  With the number of instantaneous decisions that a command officer has to make at the scene of a working fire these days a well thought out mutual aid plan is a necessity to contribute to the complex operations at hand.  The results offer operational safety to all involved.  The property owner has a response that will provide for the greatest degree of life saving ability while minimizing the potential damage to their property. The firefighters will be able to perform their tasks with the proper amount of manpower resulting in their increased safety. The Chief will be able to better provide a coordinated effort to a safe and effective outcome where both his manpower  and the citizens he serves are better served.  If in the process ISO ratings are improved well then everyone has an added bonus.  Northwoods Fire Department has always endeavored to serve the community to the best of their ability  and driven themselves to the forefront of knowledge and ability.  From my Point of View it seems that Chief Cox is continuing with that same tradition in his efforts to  forge ahead with automatic mutual aid plans that have not only proven themselves invaluable around the country but are rapidly becoming the standard of service.
FireChief700
|
December 21, 2011
I first want to say that I want to thank all the men and women that VOLUNTEER to fight fires in Robeson County,,, however it is time to change our way of operations just go on the web and listen to the firefighter mayday's that are called everyday and you as a fire chief put yourself in the shoes of that fire chief. Do you have enough people at a fire to preform the rescue of that trapped firefighter do you have enough people to set up a R.I.C. team do you have enough people to have the two in two out rule covered. Do you have enough people to have fresh firefighters ready to go in when your first attack crew comes out??? Do you have enough people to allow you to sit back and evaluate the fire and preform a GOOD command. And so many other jobs that need to be done,,,, we as the fire chief need to think about our most important tool at the fire and that TOOL IS OUR PEOPLE. Maybe we should come together and go to our county officals and ask them WHY that multi-million dollar C.A.D. system we just purchased can't or wont't do all the jobs that WE AS CHIEFS need it to do. There is no reason why we can't have the departments that wanted the extra aid programmed in the CAD to give us the aid. Charles Britt has told me that his department does not have the manpower to program the CAD so maybe we FIRE CHIEFS need to come together and get him some help. Fire Chiefs the only thing I have to say is that we need to join forces and not fight within our own ranks. I hope that when each of you take the Chief 101 you will see where alot of this came from,,,,, I also challange every fire chief and fire officer out there to apply and take a course at the National Fire Academy (it is free folks) that course is Command and Control of Incident Operations,,, hey it can't hurt.

Steven West

Chief,,, East Howellsville Fire Department
FireChief700
|
December 21, 2011
Need Assessment for Structure Fires





In Robeson County one of the most common types of structure fires dispatched is single wide mobile homes. Lets examine the man power needed for one of these fires. A fire department rolls on to the scene of a 70 foot by 14 foot wide single wide mobile home. 50% involved in fire with or with out a person believed to be inside. Fire department lays two 1 ¾ attack lines on the ground. Here is the man power that is needed.



1 Incident commander

1 Pump operator

4 FF’s two on each attack line

2 FF’s RIC or safety line you pick the term you use

2 FF’s to perform ventilation (set up fan, open windows or doors, or open roof)

1 FF’s for water supply, tanker operation

2 FF’s to perform a primary search for occupants

1 FF to perform rehab.

2 FF’s to perform overhaul



Now after an average of ten minutes of physical work wearing an air pack the 4 FF’s on attack lines and 2 FF’s performing a primary search will be out of air so it will take 6 FF’s to replace the first in crews.



6 FF’s replace first in crews.



22 FF’s needed Total.





Now the above is only the number of fire fighters that are needed for a fire that actually goes for more than ten minutes. Most structure fires the average time on scene for 50% involvement is 1 to 2 hours. For every ten to fifteen minutes of SCBA or Firefighting time (working time) you have to double your man power. Based on the manpower study listed above you will need a minimum of 22 people if the fire doesn’t go past fifteen minutes. As you are aware most departments day or nights can not put that many firefighters on the scene with three departments together and certainly not for at least 20 minutes after the first initial page.





We have got to get out of the old way of thinking and start looking out for our firefihgters and the citizens. In the words of Chief Billy Goldfeder " You need 20 firefighters responding on first alarm on an unconfirmed structure fire".



Can it be done with less manpower? the answer is yes Can it be done safely with less manpower the answer is NO! So who is responsiable if something goes wrong and someone dies or is hurt? The answer is the FIRE CHIEF!



Jeanie West

President East Howellsville Fire Department.



concernedlmc
|
December 21, 2011
First of all, i would like to say it is our duties to protect and serve the taxpayers. if it wasnt for them the fire service wouldnt/couldnt exist. we can protect them from fire, natural disasters, every day freak accidental life threatening events, and also their finances. even if he was talking about a tanker(water tender), wouldnt that also provide manpower?

i feel the government takes enough money away from the citizens already. why cant a government funded agency do what it can to assist on giving some back? "speakurmind" are you one of those who have money to throw away or are you like most struggling from day to day just to stay on top of the water? if you have enough to throw away their are probably alot of people in your district less fortunate.

Iso ratings, manpower, equiptment, and fuel are all because of the taxpayer. Do you pay taxes? If you do maybe you should think about having a lower rating to drop your insurance costs? Oh i forgot you throw money away!

All this doesnt matter. its nonsense. We probably dont need fire services anyway. Its all a crock. is that what you think? Evidentally so!

If you are going to do something, do your best, take pride in all you do. I "volunteer" also. However im a servant to the community. if it was for them i would be able to do what i enjoy. I think its commendable for Chief Cox to hold us to a high standard, not only to save lives and preserve properties, but to know how to do it safely and keep our rears from having to see that horrible fate.

If my residence was to ignite, and my wife and precious little girl was in there TRAPPED, i wouldnt care who got the glory for rescueing them, i would be thankful they did.

Maybe you need to think about that. If you were trapped and automatic aide wasnt in place or in this case increased, how would you feel. you wouldnt care if the president sent the secret service to remove you butt, but you would be glad he did. Maybe one day you will see how we as a whole in robeson county could be better. there is always room for improvement. when you start thinking there is no room for improvements maybe its time for you to get out of the 70's and get in the present day. fire science is always changing. or did you not learn that in fire behavior 1 and 2. On a working structure on average to have every task completed without people being overwhelmed it take roughly 30 firefighters on deck. and thats just a residence not a commercial structure. IS INCREASED AUTOMATIC AIDE TOO MUCH TO ASK FOR? I THINK NOT!

CHIEF COX I say thank you for asking for the increase. Why, you ask? Because sooner or later everyone gets caught with their pants down. You are only doing one thing by not wanting it increased. And thats setting yourself up to lose, one way or the other.
formerRobCoFF
|
December 20, 2011
I started out in the fire service in Robeson County. I have since moved across the state and I am now a career firefighter. I have been a member of different volunteer fire departments and have served in multiple counties and I must say that Robeson is the only county I have volunteered in that doesn't send THREE departments on the initial dispatch of a reported structure fire. The county that I presently work in initial dispatch consist of three fire departments, and rescue squad, and if confirmed an ambulance to standby. Three departments on initial dispatch seems like a no brainer to me. It could be the difference in life or death for one of our own or for that child that is trapped on the second floor. If you're one of the departments that is against it I firmly believe you are doing a disservice to your community and to your fellow firefighters.
SpeakUrMind
|
December 19, 2011
Its very sad that a Vol. Fire Chief would actually take the time to write a letter downing other Vol. Fire Chiefs or other Departments!!! We are all Volunteers here key word "VOLUNTEER!!!!" Ediie I cant belive that you would write this as the question was posed to you in the Chiefs meeting "Are you asking for this beacause you need help on the scene as far as manpower?" Your response to that statement was "no I have enough people to do what we need to do but to get a ISO (Dept of Insurance Rating) rating of 6 I need another tanker on the scene!!" You werent asking for manpower you were asking for a truck so you can get a better insurance rating. I dont feel every department in the county should have to increase their call volume so you can "Get a tanker" save your money and buy one is my thoughts!!! Several Depts in the county run around 250 calls a year so that would put us running a additional 75 to 100 calls which we dont have a problem with if the need is their but to you help you "Get a tanker" I dont think that justifies a need for Robeson County!!! Vol. fire departments is the largest Vol Organization in the state and I cant believe that anyone would begin to downgrade this group of men and women but a Fire Chief now thats a really childish move........maybe we need to charge everyone in Northwoods Fire District to contact their fire chief and ask for him to Step Down!!!!!!
NFDFIRECHIEF
|
December 20, 2011
Love the fact that "VOLUNTEERS" are not required to have the same standard as everyone else. I understand that you "GIVE" your time.... NOBODY put a gun to your head and forced you to join the department. You do it because you serve, hopefully with pride, and not because of any other reason.

My thoughts on "volunteers" is simply this. At 3AM, a structure fire is paged out. Its a 2 story, 2000 sq ft home. Mama is in the front yard screaming her baby is trapped on the 2nd floor.... A) Does she really care about your compensation status? (NO!!!) B) What does she expect at that moment in time???? (she expects her baby in her arms) Nothing in the equation involves your status of being a paid or "volunteer" firefighter...

Every "volunteer" fire department in this county collects a fire tax. That is the contract between you and ROBESON COUNTY to provide EXCELLENT fire protection. That contract CAN and SHOULD be revoked if you are not providing the best service you can. (That's called CUSTOMER SERVICE)

As for anyone in The NORTHWOODS FIRE DISTRICT wishing for me to step down, that would mean they have to join the fire department, maintain 120 hours of training a year, respond to 25% of all fire related calls, 50% of all business meetings, and 50% of all work details. Then they have a voice. This is a standard agreed by the MEMBERSHIP of Northwoods. Either way the fire department wins. More members, more trained PROFESSIONAL personnel, OUR CALLS ANSWERED, AND EVERYONE GOES HOME......

Please justify for me your additional 75-100 calls per year. Are these factual numbers. I would love to discuss this anyone. I'm easy to reach....
NFDFIRECHIEF
|
December 20, 2011
And just to clarify.... If a additional department did respond with a tanker (it usually has a minimum of 3 seats) that CONTRIBUTES to the manpower increase. 1 driver, 2 firefighters additional.... does kind of contribute to the "extra manpower" doesn't it....
TIREDOFTHECRAP
|
December 13, 2011
Special thanks to Charles Britt with Robeson County Emergency Management for offering the possibility to each department to better themselves. Its a shame some of these departments dont take advantage of it....
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: