by Bob Shiles, Staff Writer
8 months ago | 2760 views | 15

|
26 
|
|

Newly elected Tribal Chairman Purnell Swett celebrates his victory Tuesday with some of his supporters. | Staff photo by Bob Shiles
slideshow
PEMBROKE — Purnell Swett, a former educator in Robeson County, will become the next chairman of the Lumbee Tribe.
Voters on Tuesday handed the former Robeson County Schools superintendent a solid victory over his two challengers, Hoke County Commissioner Tony Hunt and Tribal Councilman Terry Campbell. Swett will take over the tribe’s leadership position in January from Jimmy Goins, who by tribal law could not seek a third consecutive term.
Unofficial results showed that 6,778 of the tribe’s 31,336 eligible voters — 21.6 percent — cast ballots. Swett won with 3,371 votes, almost 50 percent, Hunt received 2,758, about 41 percent, of the vote, Campbell took 649 votes, about 9 percent.
“Tonight we were very successful,” Swett told a crowd of his supporters gathered at the Southeastern Regional Farmers Market shortly after his victory was assured. “You the people took ownership of my candidacy and made it go.”
Swett said he plans to take a couple of days off to rest before starting to prepare to take over the tribal leadership.
“I don’t get sworn-in until the second Tuesday in January. That gives me time to start making a map to deal with promises I made for the long and short term during the campaign.”
Swett emphasized the need for his administration and the Tribal Council to work well together.
“To be successful we have to have a good relationship,” he said. “That’s the message people were sending me during this campaign. They want a chairman and a council that work together.”
Hunt did not return phone calls from The Robesonian to comment on the election results. Campbell, however, said he was “very proud of the outcome.”
“We couldn’t have a better candidate for chairman than Swett,” he said as he watched the votes tallied at the farmers market. “I’m looking forward to working with the new chairman.”
Campbell, who still has two years remaining on his council term, said that he will seek the chairmanship again.
“I will be back,” he said. “Now people know who I am.”
On Tuesday, voters also elected seven representatives to the 21-member Tribal Council. Eighteen candidates vied for those positions, including five incumbents.
The only incumbent to be defeated was Bradley M. McMillian, the District 10 representative. The winner was newcomer Terry Collins, who pulled in 322, or 61.1 percent of the 527 votes cast. McMillian received 177, or 33.6 percent of the vote, with Leroy “Pete” Butler taking 28, or 5.3 percent of the vote.
In District 9, incumbent James Taft Smith held on to his seat in a four-way race by a single vote. Smith received 155 votes to David Locklear’s 154. Alice Revels received 141, with Annie Gail Brewer mustering 121.
In other district races:
— District 1: Incumbent Audrey Revels Hunt, 247 votes, defeated Mary Richardson, 185 votes, and Patricia Oxendine, 69 votes.
— District 4: Incumbent Helen Locklear was the winner with 171 votes to 71 votes for Patsy Wilkins.
— District 5: Incumbent Kernice Locklear defeated Kenneth Ray Locklear 394 votes to 270
— District 7: Robert Earl Chavis defeated Oceanus Lowry 691 votes to 284.
— District 14: Homer Fields was the winner with 118 votes to 64 votes for Rosemarie Hunt.
Ertle Oxendine, chairman of the Elections Board, said that all of the vote counts are unofficial until certified within the next five days. The board will meet today to count provisional votes in District 9, the one district where Oxendine said provisional votes may make a difference in the outcome. Oxendine said late Tuesday that he did not know the exact number of provisional votes that will have to be counted in all of the races.
The chairman said that there would most likely be a recount in the District 9 race. Candidates need only to muster a simple plurality of the votes cast to win the election. There is no run-off by the rules of the constitution, but if a candidate gets within 1 percent of the votes of the winner, a recount is automatic.
Oxendine said there were no major problems during the election, but that some of the approximate 1,600 absentee ballots received had to be rejected because “signatures failed to match up.”
Vote totals
Chairman
Purnell Swett: 3,371Tony Hunt: 2,758
Terry Campbell: 649
District 1
(I) Audrey Revels Hunt: 247Mary Richardson: 185
Patricia Oxendine: 69
District 4
(I) Helen Locklear: 171Patsy Wilkins: 71
District 5
(I) Kernice Locklear: 394Kenneth Ray Locklear: 270
District 7
Robert Earl Chavis: 691Oceanus Lowry: 284
District 9
(I) James Taft Smith: 155David Locklear: 154
Alice Revels: 141
Annie Gail Brewer: 121
District 10
Terry Collins: 322(I) Bradley M. McMillian: 177
Leroy Butler: 28
District 14
Homer Fields: 118Rosemarie Hunt: 64
We have too many so called christians around here who do nothing but gossip in the church and talk bad about other people. He who is without sin should cast the first stone.
What will he consider a bonus due to him this time? Is he going to assist our Lumbee People or treat himself? Everyone that did not vote don't be SHOCKED, you didn't speak then so don't speak now. As a Christian, I know I'm suppose to forgive, so I do, yet woe unto those that are crooked. " Whose ways are crooked, and they froward in their paths" Proverbs 2:15
My prayers are with Our Lumbee Tribe and Nation!!! GOD BLESS US
I predict the future. Several complaints will be filed. Purnell Swett and others will be in Federal court pleaing their case. The Tribe better create a internal affairs division by January. Milton Hunt I hope you keep a eye on this snake in the grass.
Mr. Purnell if your at any Tribal fuction I attend I will turn my back to you.
Purnell Swett:: (silence)
District 10 that knows what he is doing. Maybe the tribe has finnaly elected the right man to do the job.
so your brand of logic basically assumes that mr. hunt's so-called 'undesirable' friends/supporters cannot be held accountable for their past actions ("many years ago")? moving on, a septuagenarian would have been in their 60's "10" years ago. quite a mature age for such irresponsible choices don't you think? character development/maintenance illustrations aside, i'm certain that mr. purnell is a good man. but that is really beside the point. the point is he looks bad on paper. (board of governors anyone?) our journalist friends at the N&O, & the really big dogs in washington (BIA, etc.) will eat him for breakfast. and, i'm so tired of us (lumbees) being the punchline. this chairmanship was an unnecessary risk when you consider how close we are to fed recognition @ this juncture. at any rate, those are my final thoughts - i will support our new chairman in 2010.
BelleinRobCo