Fatcow Icon
The true measure
Dec 16, 2012 | 3448 views | 11 11 comments | 9 9 recommendations | email to a friend | print

The last few days haven’t favored the U.S. Constitution, that venerable 225-year-old document from which all that is great about this country has derived.

On Thursday, a Superior Court judge in Cumberland County commuted the sentences to life in prison of three death row inmates, including two who had killed police officers. The lives of Christina “Queen” Walters, Tilmon Golphin and Quintel Augustine will be spared — barring a successful appeal by the state — not because any had been redeemed in the eyes of the law; they remain cold-blooded murderers who killed without reason or provocation, snuffing out lives of promise and bringing never-ending and untold grief to the families and friends of their victims.

Their lives were spared because Judge Gregory A. Weeks concluded that prosecutors, during jury selection, plotted to dismiss jurors of color, making the jury too white and too hostile to people of color — Walters is a Lumbee Indian, and Golphin and Augustine are black. Weeks determined that these three murderers were consequently denied a fair trial, which is guaranteed under this country’s Constitution.

The next day, word began to spread mid-morning that there was yet another mass murder, this one at an elementary school in Newtown, Conn. The count as this is being written is 26 people murdered at the school, including 20 children in grades kindergarten through 4th; the killer himself, who committed suicide; and the killer’s mother.

The smoke from the gunfire had barely cleared before talk was resurrected about the Constitution’s Second Amendment, the original version of which reads: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

Adopted in 1791 as part of the Bill of Rights, the Second Amendment has been passionately debated since, yet there is no consensus on exactly what those 27 words mean. They don’t mention assault weapons, nor do they hint that “Arms” would be limited to muskets. And what did the framers mean by a “well regulated Militia”?

There are no new lessons learned from the end of last week. The Constitution at times seems incredibly unsatisfying, such as when it leans toward murderers and away from their victims, or it appears as an accomplice in the massacre of children.

It is now that we must remember that the Constitution’s greatness is measured by its 225-year record, not by events of late last week — and that the gift of living in the land of liberty is not without a price.



Comments
(11)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
PercyKution
|
December 16, 2012
"Racist" is just a MADE UP WORD for FOOLS to throw when their own opinion won't hold water. That is, if whats coming out of your mouth makes NO SENSE, and you KNOW it and the other person knows it, attack the other person by calling them a MADE UP name. But I guess you COULD call Jimmy Johnson, Jeff Gordon, Tony Stewart, Richard Petty and that bunch "racists". They're "racists" every Sunday.
sagehopper
|
December 16, 2012
Being from another state, I know nothing of tghis case. BUT..the Defense attorneys will do the same thing when they are in the jury seating stage of a trial..I have been dismissed from two different juries because I happened to work in a hospital, and had treated cases of overdoses, and victims of gang violence..The point is, in every jury case, both the prosecution, and the defense, can challenge a number of the jury pool, and for any reason they choose. It isn't a concept that only the prosecution can use. It is not something that should call for the nullification of a verdict..unless...the jury convicted on the basis of race, creed, or background instead of the facts of the case..
ROSSisRIGHT
|
December 15, 2012
This is why they avoided the blacks for jurors during these trials. This so called judge is black, and the bias he has is clear.

Do you actually think a black juror will send a black man to death row for killing a white or indian?.......Do you? Yeah, just like they voted for Obama because they like his politics......
AnOpinion
|
December 16, 2012
Seriously, "the blacks." I do realize that freedom of press or freedom of the media is the freedom of communication and expression through mediums including various electronic media and published materials. This guy RossIsRight is not press so he is using his freedom of speech. We all have a right to express ourselves and give our opinions. Do you, The Robesonian, really not feel the need to sensor this guy? He blatantly makes these types of comments time and time again. The comments are obviously racist and nothing is ever done about it. He is ignorant and I am very disappointed that his comments continue to appear even though they are clearly racist.
ROSSisRIGHT
|
December 16, 2012
anopinion: You know what, this is getting boring. I want YOU to explain to everybody reading this just what exactly is RACIST that I said. YOU and YOU only. Just by me mentioning blacks make people "like" you think it's racist. Read what I said. It was about the judge(who is black) and the murderers(who are black).

Anytime someone says something about blacks that you don't like YOU think it's racist. Learn the meaning of the word, and then learn we are humans and this is how we communicate, BY TALKING. Whether you like it or not.

Again, if I talk about leaves falling off "tree's" around here, does this mean I hate tree's?

Eric Holder said we are "a nation of cowards when discusing race".... Well I'm not, but you must be.

Blacks can make comments about whites all the time and nothing is said. (Bubba, Billy,rednecks,kkk,hillbilly,hunting,farmer,Jeff Foxworthy,Hank Hill,rich,work ethic,family,etc..) Some words used daily and noone blinks. But better not say these: (welfare,foodstamps,apartment, Chicago,lazy,angry,obama phones,looters,thugs,gangs,rappers,baby daddy,etc...) those will get you called a name.

Funny how it works isn't it? Some could care less about words, and others get all bent out of shape. Hmmmm, one wonders why........
orighawk
|
December 16, 2012
@AnO...the entire story is based on race...you say everyone has a right express themselves and then ask the robesonian to censure Ross because what he types is inflammatory and against "popular" opinion...what about his rights? Or is freedom of expression only for the popular opinions of the time?
ROSSisRIGHT
|
December 16, 2012
Orighawk: I know, funny isn't it. Hey, how about that, a typical democrat obama supporter. They want to sensor anything they don't like. Rush Limbaugh, Me, and God. Just a few things they don't like or want to hear....

How 'bout just sticking your fingers in your ears when someone you disagree with speaks. Works everytime. This way you wont trample on my constitutional rights....

Orighawk, we got a mess around here don't we? Hey my friend, you stay safe there in Pembroke, ok..... Ross.
SportsJunkie
|
December 17, 2012
Sagehopper, you are absolutely correct. The prosecution and the defense attorney both have the same number of jurors they can strike. After their strikes, what's left is what you get. So what if that judge is bias, I guess this the only case that has been viewed as bias.I also agree that RossisRight comment could be viewed as inflammatory. We do not need to censor him, because alot of people think just like him. Ross is a reminder to many that America has a long way to go,
ROSSisRIGHT
|
December 17, 2012
Sportjunkie: Inflammatory is what these murderers did. Inflammatory is what this judge did......

You can stick your head in the sand and hold your breath all you want too, but what I said NEEDED TO BE SAID! Open your eyes man/lady, whatever....

Ps. You darn(spit) right we got a long way to go...........
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: