Fatcow Icon
RAE president blasts reform plan
by Bob Shiles
Staff writer
Jamie Burney: There are 15 ways to dismiss a poor teacher.
Jamie Burney: There are 15 ways to dismiss a poor teacher.
slideshow

LUMBERTON — The president of the Robeson Association of Educators doesn’t think there will be enough support from state legislators to pass a proposed Senate education reform package that calls for the elimination of teacher tenure and requires local school districts to set up a system of awarding teachers merit pay.

“It saddens me that the GOP is choosing to make poor decisions regarding public education,” said Jamie Burney, the association’s leader and a seventh-grade social studies teacher at Pembroke Middle School. “I don’t think they will be able to garner enough votes for this bill.”

The proposed reform package, unveiled Monday by Senate leader Phil Berger, proposes major changes in rules regulating teacher employment, teacher training and student academic requirements. In addition to eliminating teacher tenure and requiring teacher merit pay, the reform package includes increasing the school year by five days and establishes initiatives to improve reading skills, including a special summer literacy camp for third graders who are falling behind with their reading skills.

In announcing the school initiatives, Berger said most of the proposals should be well received because they are structured to better prepare students to graduate from high school and prevent the need for students to attend costly remedial classes at universities and community colleges. According to a report by The Associated Press, the cost of the proposed package for the fiscal year beginning July 1 is $45 million.

Berger reportedly said he is aware that some of the proposals in the package, such as tenure elimination, will most likely be controversial. Debate on the “Excellent Public Schools Act” is likely to be high on the list of business to be conducted by state legislators when they return to Raleigh on May 16 for the General Assembly’s short session, the time when adjustments are made to the state budget.

Burney said that it is “absolutely” not true that there is no process in place to dismiss a poor teacher. He said that state law specifically lists 15 grounds for terminating a teacher. Among the grounds are: inadequate performance; immorality; insubordination; neglect of duty; mental or physical incapacity; and conviction of a felony.

“When a teacher receives tenure, it means they have met the qualifications for employment and ensures that there can be no retaliation made against them for personal or political reasons, ” he said.

Tenure is currently given to veteran public school teachers after a four-year probationary period working in the same district. The feeling of Berger’s office reportedly is that current policy makes it difficult to fire tenured teachers when administrators determine they are ineffective. Berger’s bill would change the policy to allow local school boards to employ all teachers on an annual contract that doesn’t have to be renewed each fall.

Burney said that the requirement that individual school districts set up a performance pay system for licensed personnel starting with the 2013-14 school year is also a concern.

“Personally, I don’t believe there is a fair way to implement a merit pay system,” he said. “It’s not fair to base merit pay on teacher evaluations, which can be fairly subjective, nor on how much student test scores increase.”

Dwayne Smith, a member of the Public Schools of Robeson County Board of Education, calls the tenure issue a “sticky situation.”

“You don’t want to eliminate tenure altogether, but on the other hand, if you have a teacher that is not doing their job you don’t want it to take an act of Congress to get rid of them,” he said. “… I think every teacher should be accountable for their actions. If they are doing a good job they won’t have to worry their employment will be terminated.”

Smith said it is going to be difficult for local school boards to develop performance-based bonuses for teachers.

“It’s an issue of fairness,” Smith said. “… How do you compare the performance of teachers in a different schools, where one has 21 students in the classroom and another has 30 students?”

Local legislators wanted to know more.

“I’ll be meeting with local educators to get their ideas,” said Sen. Michael Walters, a Democrat. “I don’t want to comment until then.”

Rep. Charles Graham, a Democrat, said he hasn’t yet read the bill but plans to “seek information from a variety of sources.”

“I certainly, as a former educator, advocate for our children to receive the best teachers and resources needed to provide the best possible education,” Graham said. “It’s our job as legislators to see that our teachers have all the tools they need to be effective teachers.”

G.L. Pridgen, the delegation’s only Republican, wants change.

“People need to realize that with tenure the way it is now, teachers are graded on the years they have worked and not on how they do their job,” Pridgen said. “Teachers should be graded on job performance, not years of employment.”

Reach staff writer Bob Shiles at 910-272-6117 or bshiles@heartlandpublications.com.

Comments
(6)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
tellit
|
April 30, 2012
Not sure why everyone is so opposed to Merit Pay. A teacher wants to earn better pay then earn it with performance in the class room. The problem with public education is that it is not run like a business. If a business wants to be successful they hire the best people and offer incentives for increased quality and production. Teachers are no different. Good teacher will not have an issue with this system. I would always rather have the opportunity to earn a better salary based on my own performance as I know what I am capable of and will strive to always get better. THe only ones afraid of this system are those that are worried about protection of tenure and their own abilities to get better. Businesses succeed by getting better and schools should try this as the route we have been on has not exactly produced the best results (although it has gotten better in dropout/graduation rates, etc.) Why all the fear. Also, in dealing with tenure if someone is doing their job you do not have to worry about retaliation or political issues surrounding their position.
crazystuff
|
April 30, 2012
I posted earlier concerning the two faced talking by the RAE president burney but it was not posted. I do not spend my time commenting to have it dismissed by whoever is editing.

The above president burney was moved from Fairmont Middle School because he was posting photos of himself along with students on his myspace account. They couldn't get rid of him so they moved him to Pembroke Middle School. Now he wants you to believe that the county has the power to dismiss teachers. If that were the case then he would no longer be with the school system. Tell your lies to someone else burney.
teacherman
|
May 05, 2012
Originally, I was not going to comment on this absurd comment, but I feel it is warranted to parents and students who may read this trash and make assumptions. Indeed, I was transferred from Fairmont to Pembroke because I had pictures of my students displayed. These were pictures from the Jr. Beta Club Convention, from Student Council Events, from Field Day, and from the classroom. It was a mistake to post them, but not one that violated the law or meant I was a bad teacher. In fact, that same year, I represented the FMS as teacher of the year and hae since earned that honor at another. Perhaps you should get your facts straight before spreading information out of context. My contact information is public record if you wish to ask me about it. I do not hide behind a username that doesn't identify who I am.
PercyKution
|
April 29, 2012
I used to think right highly of 'Ol G. L. I voted for him and even got 2 or 3 more people to do likewise. But I won't again. He's just not acting or talking right, for some reason. I believe the boy has had a right serious lick in the head or something. Sure is a lot of sadness in the world.
thelonegrandma
|
April 29, 2012
"Rep. Charles Graham, a Democrat, said he hasn’t yet read the bill but plans to “seek information from a variety of sources.”

Why hasn't he read the bill? Charles Graham was a joke when he was in the school system, and he is a joke now.
PercyKution
|
April 30, 2012
Charles Graham hasn't read the bill, because Charles Graham CAN'T read. Did'nt you know that? And if he COULD read, he could'nt understand it. No use to make fun of the poor unfortunate FOOL, he's doing THE BEST HE CAN.
Reunions for June 9, 2013
Family reunions: Jakie Locklear Family Reunion will be held at 12:30 p.m. on July 13 in the fell...
Jun 10, 2013 | 0 0 comments | 79 79 recommendations | email to a friend
full story
Religion briefs for June 9, 2013
Ongoing Freedom Christian Fellowship holds its celebration service Sundays at 10 a.m.; prayer Mo...
Jun 10, 2013 | 0 0 comments | 76 76 recommendations | email to a friend
full story
What's Happening for June 9, 2013
Monday Kayaking trip: The Lumber River State Park will hold a guided sunset kayak trip down the ...
Jun 10, 2013 | 0 0 comments | 77 77 recommendations | email to a friend
full story
"Focused" New Release By David Spencer
The “musical melting pot” David Spencer encountered while studying music at North Carolina Centra...
May 23, 2013 | 0 0 comments | 82 82 recommendations | email to a friend
full story

Happy 236th
Thousands of people were dazzled by the fireworks display at the annual Lumberton Family Fourth celebration at the Lumberton High School football stadium on Tuesday. Many watched the display from parking lots and sidewalks around town and from their own front yards. Before the show, attendees were treated to a performance by the Carolina Breakers, and a stunt by the Army Rangers, who parachuted onto the football field.

News
BackWithRobeson
|
June 18, 2013
I agree with you MadeInBladen. I don't have a problem with them giving money to the communities. Its easy to say what you would do when you're not in that position. Looks like we have a bunch of armchair quarterbacks around here.
MadeInBladen
|
June 18, 2013
Why get rid of the funds, What about the kids who want to play little league and can't afford it? I understand that the commissioners know that it is the taxpayers money and it is going back to the community.
rhsgrad
|
June 18, 2013
I understand the cynicism but Hooray for the decision...it's a step in the right direction...and again, thank you to The Robesonian for staying on top of this story!
sagehopper
|
June 18, 2013
Self imposed impotence, if that's what you want to call it. I call it dereliction of duty, and lying under oath, because they all took an oath to uphold the Constitution, and it's laws. And they have NOT even attempted to follow immigration laws, let along prosecute them when they have been broken. The President and the Attorney General are prime offenders. Votes are at the bottom of any bill that considers amnesty or cutting into line, by border jumpers. It is a slap in the face by those who have done it legally. It also rewards lawbreaking. Just carry out the laws we already have in place. And believe me...there are enough on the books to keep any red-tape bureaucrat rolling in the clover for a long time.
BarbArity
|
June 18, 2013
I'd love to believe that but I'm afraid it is too little too late. The discretionary fund show be done away with and their salaries and stipends lowered. They're rushing to pacify and that is all.
Read More News
Sports
BackWithRobeson
|
June 18, 2013
I agree with you MadeInBladen. I don't have a problem with them giving money to the communities. Its easy to say what you would do when you're not in that position. Looks like we have a bunch of armchair quarterbacks around here.
MadeInBladen
|
June 18, 2013
Why get rid of the funds, What about the kids who want to play little league and can't afford it? I understand that the commissioners know that it is the taxpayers money and it is going back to the community.
rhsgrad
|
June 18, 2013
I understand the cynicism but Hooray for the decision...it's a step in the right direction...and again, thank you to The Robesonian for staying on top of this story!
sagehopper
|
June 18, 2013
Self imposed impotence, if that's what you want to call it. I call it dereliction of duty, and lying under oath, because they all took an oath to uphold the Constitution, and it's laws. And they have NOT even attempted to follow immigration laws, let along prosecute them when they have been broken. The President and the Attorney General are prime offenders. Votes are at the bottom of any bill that considers amnesty or cutting into line, by border jumpers. It is a slap in the face by those who have done it legally. It also rewards lawbreaking. Just carry out the laws we already have in place. And believe me...there are enough on the books to keep any red-tape bureaucrat rolling in the clover for a long time.
BarbArity
|
June 18, 2013
I'd love to believe that but I'm afraid it is too little too late. The discretionary fund show be done away with and their salaries and stipends lowered. They're rushing to pacify and that is all.
Read More Sports
Opinion
BackWithRobeson
|
June 18, 2013
I agree with you MadeInBladen. I don't have a problem with them giving money to the communities. Its easy to say what you would do when you're not in that position. Looks like we have a bunch of armchair quarterbacks around here.
MadeInBladen
|
June 18, 2013
Why get rid of the funds, What about the kids who want to play little league and can't afford it? I understand that the commissioners know that it is the taxpayers money and it is going back to the community.
rhsgrad
|
June 18, 2013
I understand the cynicism but Hooray for the decision...it's a step in the right direction...and again, thank you to The Robesonian for staying on top of this story!
sagehopper
|
June 18, 2013
Self imposed impotence, if that's what you want to call it. I call it dereliction of duty, and lying under oath, because they all took an oath to uphold the Constitution, and it's laws. And they have NOT even attempted to follow immigration laws, let along prosecute them when they have been broken. The President and the Attorney General are prime offenders. Votes are at the bottom of any bill that considers amnesty or cutting into line, by border jumpers. It is a slap in the face by those who have done it legally. It also rewards lawbreaking. Just carry out the laws we already have in place. And believe me...there are enough on the books to keep any red-tape bureaucrat rolling in the clover for a long time.
BarbArity
|
June 18, 2013
I'd love to believe that but I'm afraid it is too little too late. The discretionary fund show be done away with and their salaries and stipends lowered. They're rushing to pacify and that is all.
Read More Opinion
Weather
Sponsored By:

RSS Feeds
All articles feed
News feed
Sports feed
Videos feed
Obituaries feed
Opinion feed
Local Features
BackWithRobeson
|
June 18, 2013
I agree with you MadeInBladen. I don't have a problem with them giving money to the communities. Its easy to say what you would do when you're not in that position. Looks like we have a bunch of armchair quarterbacks around here.
MadeInBladen
|
June 18, 2013
Why get rid of the funds, What about the kids who want to play little league and can't afford it? I understand that the commissioners know that it is the taxpayers money and it is going back to the community.
rhsgrad
|
June 18, 2013
I understand the cynicism but Hooray for the decision...it's a step in the right direction...and again, thank you to The Robesonian for staying on top of this story!
sagehopper
|
June 18, 2013
Self imposed impotence, if that's what you want to call it. I call it dereliction of duty, and lying under oath, because they all took an oath to uphold the Constitution, and it's laws. And they have NOT even attempted to follow immigration laws, let along prosecute them when they have been broken. The President and the Attorney General are prime offenders. Votes are at the bottom of any bill that considers amnesty or cutting into line, by border jumpers. It is a slap in the face by those who have done it legally. It also rewards lawbreaking. Just carry out the laws we already have in place. And believe me...there are enough on the books to keep any red-tape bureaucrat rolling in the clover for a long time.
BarbArity
|
June 18, 2013
I'd love to believe that but I'm afraid it is too little too late. The discretionary fund show be done away with and their salaries and stipends lowered. They're rushing to pacify and that is all.
Read More Local Features
Poll
Sponsored By:

BackWithRobeson
|
June 18, 2013
I agree with you MadeInBladen. I don't have a problem with them giving money to the communities. Its easy to say what you would do when you're not in that position. Looks like we have a bunch of armchair quarterbacks around here.
MadeInBladen
|
June 18, 2013
Why get rid of the funds, What about the kids who want to play little league and can't afford it? I understand that the commissioners know that it is the taxpayers money and it is going back to the community.
rhsgrad
|
June 18, 2013
I understand the cynicism but Hooray for the decision...it's a step in the right direction...and again, thank you to The Robesonian for staying on top of this story!
sagehopper
|
June 18, 2013
Self imposed impotence, if that's what you want to call it. I call it dereliction of duty, and lying under oath, because they all took an oath to uphold the Constitution, and it's laws. And they have NOT even attempted to follow immigration laws, let along prosecute them when they have been broken. The President and the Attorney General are prime offenders. Votes are at the bottom of any bill that considers amnesty or cutting into line, by border jumpers. It is a slap in the face by those who have done it legally. It also rewards lawbreaking. Just carry out the laws we already have in place. And believe me...there are enough on the books to keep any red-tape bureaucrat rolling in the clover for a long time.
BarbArity
|
June 18, 2013
I'd love to believe that but I'm afraid it is too little too late. The discretionary fund show be done away with and their salaries and stipends lowered. They're rushing to pacify and that is all.
View Previous Polls
Special Sections
BackWithRobeson
|
June 18, 2013
I agree with you MadeInBladen. I don't have a problem with them giving money to the communities. Its easy to say what you would do when you're not in that position. Looks like we have a bunch of armchair quarterbacks around here.
MadeInBladen
|
June 18, 2013
Why get rid of the funds, What about the kids who want to play little league and can't afford it? I understand that the commissioners know that it is the taxpayers money and it is going back to the community.
rhsgrad
|
June 18, 2013
I understand the cynicism but Hooray for the decision...it's a step in the right direction...and again, thank you to The Robesonian for staying on top of this story!
sagehopper
|
June 18, 2013
Self imposed impotence, if that's what you want to call it. I call it dereliction of duty, and lying under oath, because they all took an oath to uphold the Constitution, and it's laws. And they have NOT even attempted to follow immigration laws, let along prosecute them when they have been broken. The President and the Attorney General are prime offenders. Votes are at the bottom of any bill that considers amnesty or cutting into line, by border jumpers. It is a slap in the face by those who have done it legally. It also rewards lawbreaking. Just carry out the laws we already have in place. And believe me...there are enough on the books to keep any red-tape bureaucrat rolling in the clover for a long time.
BarbArity
|
June 18, 2013
I'd love to believe that but I'm afraid it is too little too late. The discretionary fund show be done away with and their salaries and stipends lowered. They're rushing to pacify and that is all.
BackWithRobeson
|
June 18, 2013
I agree with you MadeInBladen. I don't have a problem with them giving money to the communities. Its easy to say what you would do when you're not in that position. Looks like we have a bunch of armchair quarterbacks around here.
MadeInBladen
|
June 18, 2013
Why get rid of the funds, What about the kids who want to play little league and can't afford it? I understand that the commissioners know that it is the taxpayers money and it is going back to the community.
rhsgrad
|
June 18, 2013
I understand the cynicism but Hooray for the decision...it's a step in the right direction...and again, thank you to The Robesonian for staying on top of this story!
sagehopper
|
June 18, 2013
Self imposed impotence, if that's what you want to call it. I call it dereliction of duty, and lying under oath, because they all took an oath to uphold the Constitution, and it's laws. And they have NOT even attempted to follow immigration laws, let along prosecute them when they have been broken. The President and the Attorney General are prime offenders. Votes are at the bottom of any bill that considers amnesty or cutting into line, by border jumpers. It is a slap in the face by those who have done it legally. It also rewards lawbreaking. Just carry out the laws we already have in place. And believe me...there are enough on the books to keep any red-tape bureaucrat rolling in the clover for a long time.
BarbArity
|
June 18, 2013
I'd love to believe that but I'm afraid it is too little too late. The discretionary fund show be done away with and their salaries and stipends lowered. They're rushing to pacify and that is all.