Fatcow Icon
Lawmakers push for pavilion funds
by Bob Shiles
Staff writer

LUMBERTON — Robeson County’s state House delegation successfully lobbied last week for an additional $100,000 to be put in the state budget to fund operating costs at the newly opened multi-purpose pavilion at the Southeastern N.C. Agricultural Center.

The pavilion is the result of two decades of work to establish a local facility capable of providing for equestrian and livestock events. Such a facility has long been promoted as one that will boost the local economy.

“It was a close vote, 61 to 55,” said Rep. Garland Pierce, a Democrat, who ran the funding amendment through the House with the support of Rep. Charles Graham, a Democrat, and G.L. Pridgen, the county’s lone Republican representative.

It’s now up to state Sen. Michael Walters to make sure the $259,000 isn’t cut from the Senate budget, according to Pierce. That amount is $141,000 less than was originally requested.

Walters said that Senate committees will begin this week reviewing the $20.3 billion budget proposal approved by the House.

“It’s important that we provide proper funding to ensure that the pavilion be successful,” said Walters, a Democrat. “We have to provide funding to market that facility, not just in North Carolina, but throughout the Southeast.”

The 55,000-square-foot building, which opened in April, will not only provide for equestrian and other livestock shows, but is capable of being used for everything from family reunions and weddings, to concerts, trade shows and other events. The facility is the responsibility of the state Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.

According to Pierce, the state money will be used to fund such things as temporary wages for employees, Social Security payments, utilities, building repairs, supplies and advertising.

“It would be ludicrous not to give enough money to support this facility,” Pierce said. “That would be setting it up to fail.”

Graham and Pridgen both agree that the state needs to provide enough money to promote the facility and keep it operating.

“This facility is in its infancy stage and needs to be given a chance to be what it is intended for,” Graham said. “There needs to be sufficient funds to keep it rolling and gaining recognition.”

“The state has already made more than a $4 million investment in the facility,” Pridgen said. “It needs to fund the pavilion’s operations so that area tourism is promoted.”

Kent Yelverton, director of the state Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services’ Division of Property and Construction, said that his department had requested close to $400,000 for operating and promoting the pavilion.

“The timing is just unfortunate,” he said. “I can’t remember any other time when the state has opened a new building and the Legislature has not immediately come up with an expansion budget for the facility. …This building is opening under an unprecedented budget situation. It’s nice to have the building, but it’s an unfortunate time to bring it on line.”

According to Yelverton, stalls that are needed to make equestrian events successful are likely not to be built at the pavilion any time soon. Originally it was anticipated that about 100 stalls, constructed at a cost of between $500,000 and $600,000, would be available by the end of the year.

To date, the only definite funding for stalls is $50,000 from both the city of Lumberton and Robeson County to match a funding request to the state Golden LEAF Foundation.

“We are continuing to look for funding for stalls,” Yelverton said. “We will submit an application for funding to Golden LEAF in mid-August. The application will be considered at Golden Leaf’s October meeting.”

Yelverton said that those who are currently using the pavilion for activities appear happy with the facility.

“All the feedback I’ve been getting is that the users are happy with the facility. There have been no issues raised,” he said.

Reach staff writer Bob Shiles at 910-272-6117 or bshiles@heartlandpublications.com.

Comments
(2)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
DaveD
|
June 03, 2012
Would someone explain to me how 100 stalls would cost between $5,000 and $6,000 each? That seems a bit steep, the building is already there, how could this cost be so high? They're just stalls...
Reunions for June 9, 2013
Family reunions: Jakie Locklear Family Reunion will be held at 12:30 p.m. on July 13 in the fell...
Jun 10, 2013 | 0 0 comments | 79 79 recommendations | email to a friend
full story
Religion briefs for June 9, 2013
Ongoing Freedom Christian Fellowship holds its celebration service Sundays at 10 a.m.; prayer Mo...
Jun 10, 2013 | 0 0 comments | 76 76 recommendations | email to a friend
full story
What's Happening for June 9, 2013
Monday Kayaking trip: The Lumber River State Park will hold a guided sunset kayak trip down the ...
Jun 10, 2013 | 0 0 comments | 76 76 recommendations | email to a friend
full story
"Focused" New Release By David Spencer
The “musical melting pot” David Spencer encountered while studying music at North Carolina Centra...
May 23, 2013 | 0 0 comments | 81 81 recommendations | email to a friend
full story

Happy 236th
Thousands of people were dazzled by the fireworks display at the annual Lumberton Family Fourth celebration at the Lumberton High School football stadium on Tuesday. Many watched the display from parking lots and sidewalks around town and from their own front yards. Before the show, attendees were treated to a performance by the Carolina Breakers, and a stunt by the Army Rangers, who parachuted onto the football field.

News
BackWithRobeson
|
June 18, 2013
I agree with you MadeInBladen. I don't have a problem with them giving money to the communities. Its easy to say what you would do when you're not in that position. Looks like we have a bunch of armchair quarterbacks around here.
MadeInBladen
|
June 18, 2013
Why get rid of the funds, What about the kids who want to play little league and can't afford it? I understand that the commissioners know that it is the taxpayers money and it is going back to the community.
rhsgrad
|
June 18, 2013
I understand the cynicism but Hooray for the decision...it's a step in the right direction...and again, thank you to The Robesonian for staying on top of this story!
sagehopper
|
June 18, 2013
Self imposed impotence, if that's what you want to call it. I call it dereliction of duty, and lying under oath, because they all took an oath to uphold the Constitution, and it's laws. And they have NOT even attempted to follow immigration laws, let along prosecute them when they have been broken. The President and the Attorney General are prime offenders. Votes are at the bottom of any bill that considers amnesty or cutting into line, by border jumpers. It is a slap in the face by those who have done it legally. It also rewards lawbreaking. Just carry out the laws we already have in place. And believe me...there are enough on the books to keep any red-tape bureaucrat rolling in the clover for a long time.
BarbArity
|
June 18, 2013
I'd love to believe that but I'm afraid it is too little too late. The discretionary fund show be done away with and their salaries and stipends lowered. They're rushing to pacify and that is all.
Read More News
Sports
BackWithRobeson
|
June 18, 2013
I agree with you MadeInBladen. I don't have a problem with them giving money to the communities. Its easy to say what you would do when you're not in that position. Looks like we have a bunch of armchair quarterbacks around here.
MadeInBladen
|
June 18, 2013
Why get rid of the funds, What about the kids who want to play little league and can't afford it? I understand that the commissioners know that it is the taxpayers money and it is going back to the community.
rhsgrad
|
June 18, 2013
I understand the cynicism but Hooray for the decision...it's a step in the right direction...and again, thank you to The Robesonian for staying on top of this story!
sagehopper
|
June 18, 2013
Self imposed impotence, if that's what you want to call it. I call it dereliction of duty, and lying under oath, because they all took an oath to uphold the Constitution, and it's laws. And they have NOT even attempted to follow immigration laws, let along prosecute them when they have been broken. The President and the Attorney General are prime offenders. Votes are at the bottom of any bill that considers amnesty or cutting into line, by border jumpers. It is a slap in the face by those who have done it legally. It also rewards lawbreaking. Just carry out the laws we already have in place. And believe me...there are enough on the books to keep any red-tape bureaucrat rolling in the clover for a long time.
BarbArity
|
June 18, 2013
I'd love to believe that but I'm afraid it is too little too late. The discretionary fund show be done away with and their salaries and stipends lowered. They're rushing to pacify and that is all.
Read More Sports
Opinion
BackWithRobeson
|
June 18, 2013
I agree with you MadeInBladen. I don't have a problem with them giving money to the communities. Its easy to say what you would do when you're not in that position. Looks like we have a bunch of armchair quarterbacks around here.
MadeInBladen
|
June 18, 2013
Why get rid of the funds, What about the kids who want to play little league and can't afford it? I understand that the commissioners know that it is the taxpayers money and it is going back to the community.
rhsgrad
|
June 18, 2013
I understand the cynicism but Hooray for the decision...it's a step in the right direction...and again, thank you to The Robesonian for staying on top of this story!
sagehopper
|
June 18, 2013
Self imposed impotence, if that's what you want to call it. I call it dereliction of duty, and lying under oath, because they all took an oath to uphold the Constitution, and it's laws. And they have NOT even attempted to follow immigration laws, let along prosecute them when they have been broken. The President and the Attorney General are prime offenders. Votes are at the bottom of any bill that considers amnesty or cutting into line, by border jumpers. It is a slap in the face by those who have done it legally. It also rewards lawbreaking. Just carry out the laws we already have in place. And believe me...there are enough on the books to keep any red-tape bureaucrat rolling in the clover for a long time.
BarbArity
|
June 18, 2013
I'd love to believe that but I'm afraid it is too little too late. The discretionary fund show be done away with and their salaries and stipends lowered. They're rushing to pacify and that is all.
Read More Opinion
Weather
Sponsored By:

RSS Feeds
All articles feed
News feed
Sports feed
Videos feed
Obituaries feed
Opinion feed
Local Features
BackWithRobeson
|
June 18, 2013
I agree with you MadeInBladen. I don't have a problem with them giving money to the communities. Its easy to say what you would do when you're not in that position. Looks like we have a bunch of armchair quarterbacks around here.
MadeInBladen
|
June 18, 2013
Why get rid of the funds, What about the kids who want to play little league and can't afford it? I understand that the commissioners know that it is the taxpayers money and it is going back to the community.
rhsgrad
|
June 18, 2013
I understand the cynicism but Hooray for the decision...it's a step in the right direction...and again, thank you to The Robesonian for staying on top of this story!
sagehopper
|
June 18, 2013
Self imposed impotence, if that's what you want to call it. I call it dereliction of duty, and lying under oath, because they all took an oath to uphold the Constitution, and it's laws. And they have NOT even attempted to follow immigration laws, let along prosecute them when they have been broken. The President and the Attorney General are prime offenders. Votes are at the bottom of any bill that considers amnesty or cutting into line, by border jumpers. It is a slap in the face by those who have done it legally. It also rewards lawbreaking. Just carry out the laws we already have in place. And believe me...there are enough on the books to keep any red-tape bureaucrat rolling in the clover for a long time.
BarbArity
|
June 18, 2013
I'd love to believe that but I'm afraid it is too little too late. The discretionary fund show be done away with and their salaries and stipends lowered. They're rushing to pacify and that is all.
Read More Local Features
Poll
Sponsored By:

BackWithRobeson
|
June 18, 2013
I agree with you MadeInBladen. I don't have a problem with them giving money to the communities. Its easy to say what you would do when you're not in that position. Looks like we have a bunch of armchair quarterbacks around here.
MadeInBladen
|
June 18, 2013
Why get rid of the funds, What about the kids who want to play little league and can't afford it? I understand that the commissioners know that it is the taxpayers money and it is going back to the community.
rhsgrad
|
June 18, 2013
I understand the cynicism but Hooray for the decision...it's a step in the right direction...and again, thank you to The Robesonian for staying on top of this story!
sagehopper
|
June 18, 2013
Self imposed impotence, if that's what you want to call it. I call it dereliction of duty, and lying under oath, because they all took an oath to uphold the Constitution, and it's laws. And they have NOT even attempted to follow immigration laws, let along prosecute them when they have been broken. The President and the Attorney General are prime offenders. Votes are at the bottom of any bill that considers amnesty or cutting into line, by border jumpers. It is a slap in the face by those who have done it legally. It also rewards lawbreaking. Just carry out the laws we already have in place. And believe me...there are enough on the books to keep any red-tape bureaucrat rolling in the clover for a long time.
BarbArity
|
June 18, 2013
I'd love to believe that but I'm afraid it is too little too late. The discretionary fund show be done away with and their salaries and stipends lowered. They're rushing to pacify and that is all.
View Previous Polls
Special Sections
BackWithRobeson
|
June 18, 2013
I agree with you MadeInBladen. I don't have a problem with them giving money to the communities. Its easy to say what you would do when you're not in that position. Looks like we have a bunch of armchair quarterbacks around here.
MadeInBladen
|
June 18, 2013
Why get rid of the funds, What about the kids who want to play little league and can't afford it? I understand that the commissioners know that it is the taxpayers money and it is going back to the community.
rhsgrad
|
June 18, 2013
I understand the cynicism but Hooray for the decision...it's a step in the right direction...and again, thank you to The Robesonian for staying on top of this story!
sagehopper
|
June 18, 2013
Self imposed impotence, if that's what you want to call it. I call it dereliction of duty, and lying under oath, because they all took an oath to uphold the Constitution, and it's laws. And they have NOT even attempted to follow immigration laws, let along prosecute them when they have been broken. The President and the Attorney General are prime offenders. Votes are at the bottom of any bill that considers amnesty or cutting into line, by border jumpers. It is a slap in the face by those who have done it legally. It also rewards lawbreaking. Just carry out the laws we already have in place. And believe me...there are enough on the books to keep any red-tape bureaucrat rolling in the clover for a long time.
BarbArity
|
June 18, 2013
I'd love to believe that but I'm afraid it is too little too late. The discretionary fund show be done away with and their salaries and stipends lowered. They're rushing to pacify and that is all.
BackWithRobeson
|
June 18, 2013
I agree with you MadeInBladen. I don't have a problem with them giving money to the communities. Its easy to say what you would do when you're not in that position. Looks like we have a bunch of armchair quarterbacks around here.
MadeInBladen
|
June 18, 2013
Why get rid of the funds, What about the kids who want to play little league and can't afford it? I understand that the commissioners know that it is the taxpayers money and it is going back to the community.
rhsgrad
|
June 18, 2013
I understand the cynicism but Hooray for the decision...it's a step in the right direction...and again, thank you to The Robesonian for staying on top of this story!
sagehopper
|
June 18, 2013
Self imposed impotence, if that's what you want to call it. I call it dereliction of duty, and lying under oath, because they all took an oath to uphold the Constitution, and it's laws. And they have NOT even attempted to follow immigration laws, let along prosecute them when they have been broken. The President and the Attorney General are prime offenders. Votes are at the bottom of any bill that considers amnesty or cutting into line, by border jumpers. It is a slap in the face by those who have done it legally. It also rewards lawbreaking. Just carry out the laws we already have in place. And believe me...there are enough on the books to keep any red-tape bureaucrat rolling in the clover for a long time.
BarbArity
|
June 18, 2013
I'd love to believe that but I'm afraid it is too little too late. The discretionary fund show be done away with and their salaries and stipends lowered. They're rushing to pacify and that is all.