Fatcow Icon
Bud driver fired after ‘poor decision’

RED SPRINGS — The policy for hiring substitute bus drivers is under review by the Public Schools of Robeson County following the firing of a driver who made “very poor decisions” during an elementary school route, a school official said Wednesday.

Walter Jackson, assistant superintendent for the school system’s Transportation and Human Resources departments, said that he was glad no one was injured during the Tuesday afternoon bus ride from Peterson Elementary School. He said the name of the driver, who had worked for the school for one month, could not be released because of privacy laws.

Red Springs resident Ella Pierce, whose granddaughter was on the bus, called The Robesonian to say that she felt her granddaughter was in danger during the route. She told the newspaper that when the students became rowdy, the bus driver stopped the bus and ordered the children to get off, causing the completion of the route to be delayed.

She said the delay caused her to worry that the bus might have been in an accident.

“The school system should hold a program at the beginning of the school year so parents can meet the drivers and learn about their background,” Pierce said this morning. “We don’t know the drivers … . We’re putting our kids in the hands of the schools and we expect that they will be safe.”

According to Tasha Oxendine, a spokesperson for the Public Schools of Robeson County, all the students had been safely dropped off at their homes by 4 p.m. Tuesday.

“It’s a very unfortunate situation,” Jackson said, “and it has been dealt with. We want to make sure these subs are really ready to get on these buses and make correct decisions.”

Raymond Cummings, the system’s director of Transportation, said he was out of town on Wednesday attending a bus drivers’ rodeo in Fayetteville and was not involved in any administrative action taken.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Reunions for June 9, 2013
Family reunions: Jakie Locklear Family Reunion will be held at 12:30 p.m. on July 13 in the fell...
Jun 10, 2013 | 0 0 comments | 89 89 recommendations | email to a friend
full story
Religion briefs for June 9, 2013
Ongoing Freedom Christian Fellowship holds its celebration service Sundays at 10 a.m.; prayer Mo...
Jun 10, 2013 | 0 0 comments | 85 85 recommendations | email to a friend
full story
What's Happening for June 9, 2013
Monday Kayaking trip: The Lumber River State Park will hold a guided sunset kayak trip down the ...
Jun 10, 2013 | 0 0 comments | 89 89 recommendations | email to a friend
full story
"Focused" New Release By David Spencer
The “musical melting pot” David Spencer encountered while studying music at North Carolina Centra...
May 23, 2013 | 0 0 comments | 90 90 recommendations | email to a friend
full story

Happy 236th
Thousands of people were dazzled by the fireworks display at the annual Lumberton Family Fourth celebration at the Lumberton High School football stadium on Tuesday. Many watched the display from parking lots and sidewalks around town and from their own front yards. Before the show, attendees were treated to a performance by the Carolina Breakers, and a stunt by the Army Rangers, who parachuted onto the football field.

News
BarbArity
|
June 19, 2013
It's beginning to sound like we have some commissioners posting! That's ok, they can post away. I don't expect little league teams to come to me or to any one other person for any money. I expect IF the discretionary funds were added back into the budget OR combined for community uses that we either voted on or applied for, that the money would be used more wisely and it would all be more transparent. Anonymous below said it well: "While there is more transparency with the voting, the funds can still be used to buy votes, and that's a problem." It's still a huge problem and those that think the commissioners did something great, just bought what they are selling.
anonymous
|
June 19, 2013
Then don't read it?
Read More News
Sports
BarbArity
|
June 19, 2013
It's beginning to sound like we have some commissioners posting! That's ok, they can post away. I don't expect little league teams to come to me or to any one other person for any money. I expect IF the discretionary funds were added back into the budget OR combined for community uses that we either voted on or applied for, that the money would be used more wisely and it would all be more transparent. Anonymous below said it well: "While there is more transparency with the voting, the funds can still be used to buy votes, and that's a problem." It's still a huge problem and those that think the commissioners did something great, just bought what they are selling.
anonymous
|
June 19, 2013
Then don't read it?
Read More Sports
Opinion
BarbArity
|
June 19, 2013
It's beginning to sound like we have some commissioners posting! That's ok, they can post away. I don't expect little league teams to come to me or to any one other person for any money. I expect IF the discretionary funds were added back into the budget OR combined for community uses that we either voted on or applied for, that the money would be used more wisely and it would all be more transparent. Anonymous below said it well: "While there is more transparency with the voting, the funds can still be used to buy votes, and that's a problem." It's still a huge problem and those that think the commissioners did something great, just bought what they are selling.
anonymous
|
June 19, 2013
Then don't read it?
Read More Opinion
Weather
Sponsored By:

RSS Feeds
All articles feed
News feed
Sports feed
Videos feed
Obituaries feed
Opinion feed
Local Features
BarbArity
|
June 19, 2013
It's beginning to sound like we have some commissioners posting! That's ok, they can post away. I don't expect little league teams to come to me or to any one other person for any money. I expect IF the discretionary funds were added back into the budget OR combined for community uses that we either voted on or applied for, that the money would be used more wisely and it would all be more transparent. Anonymous below said it well: "While there is more transparency with the voting, the funds can still be used to buy votes, and that's a problem." It's still a huge problem and those that think the commissioners did something great, just bought what they are selling.
anonymous
|
June 19, 2013
Then don't read it?
Read More Local Features
Poll
Sponsored By:

BarbArity
|
June 19, 2013
It's beginning to sound like we have some commissioners posting! That's ok, they can post away. I don't expect little league teams to come to me or to any one other person for any money. I expect IF the discretionary funds were added back into the budget OR combined for community uses that we either voted on or applied for, that the money would be used more wisely and it would all be more transparent. Anonymous below said it well: "While there is more transparency with the voting, the funds can still be used to buy votes, and that's a problem." It's still a huge problem and those that think the commissioners did something great, just bought what they are selling.
anonymous
|
June 19, 2013
Then don't read it?
View Previous Polls
Special Sections
BarbArity
|
June 19, 2013
It's beginning to sound like we have some commissioners posting! That's ok, they can post away. I don't expect little league teams to come to me or to any one other person for any money. I expect IF the discretionary funds were added back into the budget OR combined for community uses that we either voted on or applied for, that the money would be used more wisely and it would all be more transparent. Anonymous below said it well: "While there is more transparency with the voting, the funds can still be used to buy votes, and that's a problem." It's still a huge problem and those that think the commissioners did something great, just bought what they are selling.
anonymous
|
June 19, 2013
Then don't read it?
BarbArity
|
June 19, 2013
It's beginning to sound like we have some commissioners posting! That's ok, they can post away. I don't expect little league teams to come to me or to any one other person for any money. I expect IF the discretionary funds were added back into the budget OR combined for community uses that we either voted on or applied for, that the money would be used more wisely and it would all be more transparent. Anonymous below said it well: "While there is more transparency with the voting, the funds can still be used to buy votes, and that's a problem." It's still a huge problem and those that think the commissioners did something great, just bought what they are selling.
anonymous
|
June 19, 2013
Then don't read it?