Fatcow Icon
A major move
by Donnie Douglas
Editor
Fairmont native William McGirt will play in his first major when he tees off Thursday at 2:30 p.m. in the PGA Championship.
Fairmont native William McGirt will play in his first major when he tees off Thursday at 2:30 p.m. in the PGA Championship.
slideshow

KIAWAH ISLAND, S.C. — William McGirt is making a name for himself on the PGA Tour — but he prefers that it not be “Dirt.”

The Fairmont native, fresh off back-to-back top-5 finishes that added about $568,000 to his bank account and assured his place on the PGA Tour during 2013, doesn’t much like the moniker that Charlie Rymer, an analyst and personality on The Golf Channel, tagged him with.

“I despise it,” said McGirt, a sentiment he shared with Rymer through a text message.

He prefers William, the name father Curtis McGirt and mother Anne gave him when he was born on June 21, 1979.

McGirt would embrace another name — PGA Tour winner, and he thinks that time is just around the dogleg. The balance in his game was demonstrated during the True South Classic, where he led the field in greens in regulation, and the RBC Canadian Open, where he led the field in putting.

“I think it shows me No. 1 that things are starting to come together, and the work is paying off,” said McGirt, now the 200th ranked player in the world. “It shows me that I can compete out here on regular basis and I can win on this tour.”

That almost happened in Canada, when McGirt led the tournament by 2 strokes with four holes to go. But a 3-putt bogey on No. 15 and a wayward second shot on No. 18 meant victory would have to come another day. McGirt is sure that the experience will be a 15th club in the bag next time his name sits atop the leaderboard.

“The first three holes I was pretty jittery,” said McGirt, whose final-round scoring average of 70.00 ranks him 15th best on the tour. “But once I birdied No. 3, honest to goodness, it was almost scary, when the putt went it, the nerves went away.”

Although he had a 2-stroke lead heading to No. 15, McGirt didn’t know it.

“I never looked at the leaderboard all day on Sunday,” he said. “I told my caddy, you let me know if we need to stomp on the gas or ease off it.”

But as McGirt teed off on No. 18, that plan fell apart.

“Someone in the gallery yelled ‘birdie win, par ties, come on McGirt,’” he said.

There was plenty of consolation in the tie for second place — the $457,000 that elevates his status for 2013, making him eligible for some limited-field events, including the tour’s “fifth major,” the Players Championship, FedEx points that qualify him not only for the playoffs, but at 63rd on the list, positions him for a deep run, and other perks, including a badly needed week off.

“I can set my schedule now and don’t have to worry about a reshuffle,” said McGirt, who has won $986,000 this year, placing him 70th on the money list, and almost $1.52 million during his two-year career.

He will also get preferred tee times, and play with more established players, beginning at the Wyndham Classic in Greensboro that begins on Aug. 16.

“I will be playing with different people,” he said. “That’s a good thing. I have noticed when I play with top-50 players I tend to elevate my game.”

McGirt rejects the notion that his play of late — 34 under par for his last eight rounds — was lightning in a bottle, saying he had been within inches of higher finishes and bigger paydays all year long.

“It’s not like I went to Mississippi and someone switched a switch on,” said McGirt, whose nine missed cuts this year are by a total of 13 strokes. “The difference was the putts started catching the lips and going in.”

Another difference is McGirt won’t have to fight for his playing rights for a second straight year, and on Thursday his career takes a major step, when he tees off in the PGA Championship, one of golf’s elite events, along with the Masters, U.S. Open and British Open. He had missed making the PGA field by a mere $11, but was first alternate, and when Keegan Bradley, the defending PGA champion, won the Bridgestone Invitational on Sunday, the door opened for McGirt.

But he was already preparing.

While being interviewed for this story on Thursday, he and wife Sarah were driving from his Boiling Springs, S.C., home to Kiawah Island, where he spent his weekend off getting in work on the Ocean Course, introduced to the world during the 1991 Ryder Cup as being a penal venue. The first three times he played the course this past week, the wind came from different directions.

Before that, he had played the Ocean Course just once, as a freshman at Wofford College, but in some ways it will feel like home. He is an honorary member of the club, and his longtime coach, Danny Stewart, is head pro at the Country Club of South Carolina at nearby Charleston. McGirt expects there will be plenty of familiar faces in the gallery.

“I can’t think of a better place other than Pinehurst for to play my first major,” said McGirt, who tees off on No. 1 at 2:30 p.m. on Thursday and on No. 10 at 9:20 a.m. on Friday. “I am very excited. It will be close to home, and a ton of people there that I know.”

While his life on the course has changed for the better, so will his life at home. He and Sarah are expecting their first child in January. Although Sarah has been his Girl Friday on the tour, taking care of all the other things while he tends to his golf game, McGirt believes being a father will just make him a better player.

“We are both excited …,” he said. “It should be good for me on the course, make me focus more and spend better time practicing as I am going to be eager to get home to spend time with her and the baby.”

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Reunions for June 9, 2013
Family reunions: Jakie Locklear Family Reunion will be held at 12:30 p.m. on July 13 in the fell...
Jun 10, 2013 | 0 0 comments | 79 79 recommendations | email to a friend
full story
Religion briefs for June 9, 2013
Ongoing Freedom Christian Fellowship holds its celebration service Sundays at 10 a.m.; prayer Mo...
Jun 10, 2013 | 0 0 comments | 76 76 recommendations | email to a friend
full story
What's Happening for June 9, 2013
Monday Kayaking trip: The Lumber River State Park will hold a guided sunset kayak trip down the ...
Jun 10, 2013 | 0 0 comments | 76 76 recommendations | email to a friend
full story
"Focused" New Release By David Spencer
The “musical melting pot” David Spencer encountered while studying music at North Carolina Centra...
May 23, 2013 | 0 0 comments | 81 81 recommendations | email to a friend
full story

Happy 236th
Thousands of people were dazzled by the fireworks display at the annual Lumberton Family Fourth celebration at the Lumberton High School football stadium on Tuesday. Many watched the display from parking lots and sidewalks around town and from their own front yards. Before the show, attendees were treated to a performance by the Carolina Breakers, and a stunt by the Army Rangers, who parachuted onto the football field.

News
BackWithRobeson
|
June 18, 2013
I agree with you MadeInBladen. I don't have a problem with them giving money to the communities. Its easy to say what you would do when you're not in that position. Looks like we have a bunch of armchair quarterbacks around here.
MadeInBladen
|
June 18, 2013
Why get rid of the funds, What about the kids who want to play little league and can't afford it? I understand that the commissioners know that it is the taxpayers money and it is going back to the community.
rhsgrad
|
June 18, 2013
I understand the cynicism but Hooray for the decision...it's a step in the right direction...and again, thank you to The Robesonian for staying on top of this story!
sagehopper
|
June 18, 2013
Self imposed impotence, if that's what you want to call it. I call it dereliction of duty, and lying under oath, because they all took an oath to uphold the Constitution, and it's laws. And they have NOT even attempted to follow immigration laws, let along prosecute them when they have been broken. The President and the Attorney General are prime offenders. Votes are at the bottom of any bill that considers amnesty or cutting into line, by border jumpers. It is a slap in the face by those who have done it legally. It also rewards lawbreaking. Just carry out the laws we already have in place. And believe me...there are enough on the books to keep any red-tape bureaucrat rolling in the clover for a long time.
BarbArity
|
June 18, 2013
I'd love to believe that but I'm afraid it is too little too late. The discretionary fund show be done away with and their salaries and stipends lowered. They're rushing to pacify and that is all.
Read More News
Sports
BackWithRobeson
|
June 18, 2013
I agree with you MadeInBladen. I don't have a problem with them giving money to the communities. Its easy to say what you would do when you're not in that position. Looks like we have a bunch of armchair quarterbacks around here.
MadeInBladen
|
June 18, 2013
Why get rid of the funds, What about the kids who want to play little league and can't afford it? I understand that the commissioners know that it is the taxpayers money and it is going back to the community.
rhsgrad
|
June 18, 2013
I understand the cynicism but Hooray for the decision...it's a step in the right direction...and again, thank you to The Robesonian for staying on top of this story!
sagehopper
|
June 18, 2013
Self imposed impotence, if that's what you want to call it. I call it dereliction of duty, and lying under oath, because they all took an oath to uphold the Constitution, and it's laws. And they have NOT even attempted to follow immigration laws, let along prosecute them when they have been broken. The President and the Attorney General are prime offenders. Votes are at the bottom of any bill that considers amnesty or cutting into line, by border jumpers. It is a slap in the face by those who have done it legally. It also rewards lawbreaking. Just carry out the laws we already have in place. And believe me...there are enough on the books to keep any red-tape bureaucrat rolling in the clover for a long time.
BarbArity
|
June 18, 2013
I'd love to believe that but I'm afraid it is too little too late. The discretionary fund show be done away with and their salaries and stipends lowered. They're rushing to pacify and that is all.
Read More Sports
Opinion
BackWithRobeson
|
June 18, 2013
I agree with you MadeInBladen. I don't have a problem with them giving money to the communities. Its easy to say what you would do when you're not in that position. Looks like we have a bunch of armchair quarterbacks around here.
MadeInBladen
|
June 18, 2013
Why get rid of the funds, What about the kids who want to play little league and can't afford it? I understand that the commissioners know that it is the taxpayers money and it is going back to the community.
rhsgrad
|
June 18, 2013
I understand the cynicism but Hooray for the decision...it's a step in the right direction...and again, thank you to The Robesonian for staying on top of this story!
sagehopper
|
June 18, 2013
Self imposed impotence, if that's what you want to call it. I call it dereliction of duty, and lying under oath, because they all took an oath to uphold the Constitution, and it's laws. And they have NOT even attempted to follow immigration laws, let along prosecute them when they have been broken. The President and the Attorney General are prime offenders. Votes are at the bottom of any bill that considers amnesty or cutting into line, by border jumpers. It is a slap in the face by those who have done it legally. It also rewards lawbreaking. Just carry out the laws we already have in place. And believe me...there are enough on the books to keep any red-tape bureaucrat rolling in the clover for a long time.
BarbArity
|
June 18, 2013
I'd love to believe that but I'm afraid it is too little too late. The discretionary fund show be done away with and their salaries and stipends lowered. They're rushing to pacify and that is all.
Read More Opinion
Weather
Sponsored By:

RSS Feeds
All articles feed
News feed
Sports feed
Videos feed
Obituaries feed
Opinion feed
Local Features
BackWithRobeson
|
June 18, 2013
I agree with you MadeInBladen. I don't have a problem with them giving money to the communities. Its easy to say what you would do when you're not in that position. Looks like we have a bunch of armchair quarterbacks around here.
MadeInBladen
|
June 18, 2013
Why get rid of the funds, What about the kids who want to play little league and can't afford it? I understand that the commissioners know that it is the taxpayers money and it is going back to the community.
rhsgrad
|
June 18, 2013
I understand the cynicism but Hooray for the decision...it's a step in the right direction...and again, thank you to The Robesonian for staying on top of this story!
sagehopper
|
June 18, 2013
Self imposed impotence, if that's what you want to call it. I call it dereliction of duty, and lying under oath, because they all took an oath to uphold the Constitution, and it's laws. And they have NOT even attempted to follow immigration laws, let along prosecute them when they have been broken. The President and the Attorney General are prime offenders. Votes are at the bottom of any bill that considers amnesty or cutting into line, by border jumpers. It is a slap in the face by those who have done it legally. It also rewards lawbreaking. Just carry out the laws we already have in place. And believe me...there are enough on the books to keep any red-tape bureaucrat rolling in the clover for a long time.
BarbArity
|
June 18, 2013
I'd love to believe that but I'm afraid it is too little too late. The discretionary fund show be done away with and their salaries and stipends lowered. They're rushing to pacify and that is all.
Read More Local Features
Poll
Sponsored By:

BackWithRobeson
|
June 18, 2013
I agree with you MadeInBladen. I don't have a problem with them giving money to the communities. Its easy to say what you would do when you're not in that position. Looks like we have a bunch of armchair quarterbacks around here.
MadeInBladen
|
June 18, 2013
Why get rid of the funds, What about the kids who want to play little league and can't afford it? I understand that the commissioners know that it is the taxpayers money and it is going back to the community.
rhsgrad
|
June 18, 2013
I understand the cynicism but Hooray for the decision...it's a step in the right direction...and again, thank you to The Robesonian for staying on top of this story!
sagehopper
|
June 18, 2013
Self imposed impotence, if that's what you want to call it. I call it dereliction of duty, and lying under oath, because they all took an oath to uphold the Constitution, and it's laws. And they have NOT even attempted to follow immigration laws, let along prosecute them when they have been broken. The President and the Attorney General are prime offenders. Votes are at the bottom of any bill that considers amnesty or cutting into line, by border jumpers. It is a slap in the face by those who have done it legally. It also rewards lawbreaking. Just carry out the laws we already have in place. And believe me...there are enough on the books to keep any red-tape bureaucrat rolling in the clover for a long time.
BarbArity
|
June 18, 2013
I'd love to believe that but I'm afraid it is too little too late. The discretionary fund show be done away with and their salaries and stipends lowered. They're rushing to pacify and that is all.
View Previous Polls
Special Sections
BackWithRobeson
|
June 18, 2013
I agree with you MadeInBladen. I don't have a problem with them giving money to the communities. Its easy to say what you would do when you're not in that position. Looks like we have a bunch of armchair quarterbacks around here.
MadeInBladen
|
June 18, 2013
Why get rid of the funds, What about the kids who want to play little league and can't afford it? I understand that the commissioners know that it is the taxpayers money and it is going back to the community.
rhsgrad
|
June 18, 2013
I understand the cynicism but Hooray for the decision...it's a step in the right direction...and again, thank you to The Robesonian for staying on top of this story!
sagehopper
|
June 18, 2013
Self imposed impotence, if that's what you want to call it. I call it dereliction of duty, and lying under oath, because they all took an oath to uphold the Constitution, and it's laws. And they have NOT even attempted to follow immigration laws, let along prosecute them when they have been broken. The President and the Attorney General are prime offenders. Votes are at the bottom of any bill that considers amnesty or cutting into line, by border jumpers. It is a slap in the face by those who have done it legally. It also rewards lawbreaking. Just carry out the laws we already have in place. And believe me...there are enough on the books to keep any red-tape bureaucrat rolling in the clover for a long time.
BarbArity
|
June 18, 2013
I'd love to believe that but I'm afraid it is too little too late. The discretionary fund show be done away with and their salaries and stipends lowered. They're rushing to pacify and that is all.
BackWithRobeson
|
June 18, 2013
I agree with you MadeInBladen. I don't have a problem with them giving money to the communities. Its easy to say what you would do when you're not in that position. Looks like we have a bunch of armchair quarterbacks around here.
MadeInBladen
|
June 18, 2013
Why get rid of the funds, What about the kids who want to play little league and can't afford it? I understand that the commissioners know that it is the taxpayers money and it is going back to the community.
rhsgrad
|
June 18, 2013
I understand the cynicism but Hooray for the decision...it's a step in the right direction...and again, thank you to The Robesonian for staying on top of this story!
sagehopper
|
June 18, 2013
Self imposed impotence, if that's what you want to call it. I call it dereliction of duty, and lying under oath, because they all took an oath to uphold the Constitution, and it's laws. And they have NOT even attempted to follow immigration laws, let along prosecute them when they have been broken. The President and the Attorney General are prime offenders. Votes are at the bottom of any bill that considers amnesty or cutting into line, by border jumpers. It is a slap in the face by those who have done it legally. It also rewards lawbreaking. Just carry out the laws we already have in place. And believe me...there are enough on the books to keep any red-tape bureaucrat rolling in the clover for a long time.
BarbArity
|
June 18, 2013
I'd love to believe that but I'm afraid it is too little too late. The discretionary fund show be done away with and their salaries and stipends lowered. They're rushing to pacify and that is all.