Fatcow Icon
Fairmont police keep cars for the ride home
by Teddy Kulmala
Staff writer
Jan 18, 2012 | 3839 views | 2 2 comments | 13 13 recommendations | email to a friend | print
 Chief Danny Parker, the chief of Public Safety, tells the Board of Commissioners Tuesday that preventing police officers from driving their vehicles home could have consequences. The motion was rejected when Mayor Charles Kemp broke a tie with his vote. Teddy Kulmala | The Robesonian
Chief Danny Parker, the chief of Public Safety, tells the Board of Commissioners Tuesday that preventing police officers from driving their vehicles home could have consequences. The motion was rejected when Mayor Charles Kemp broke a tie with his vote. Teddy Kulmala | The Robesonian
slideshow

FAIRMONT — Public Safety officers didn’t lose their ride on Tuesday when the Fairmont Board of Commissioners rejected a motion that would have prohibited officers living outside town from driving police cars home.

Commissioners J.J. McCree, Charles Townsend and Carol Leak-McKenzie voted for the motion, and Wayland Lennon III, Perry Ashley and Wade Sealey voted against, creating a tie that was broken by Mayor Charles Kemp.

McCree made the motion, saying the town needed to cut costs to rebuild its General Fund as mandated by the state Local Government Commission.

“They specifically told us to go back, raise what we could, cut what we could,” McCree said. “… If we weren’t under what the state was requiring, I wouldn’t be considering this option.”

A report provided by the Department of Public Safety indicated that the town spent about $5,800 during 2011 for the 14 vehicles in the Administration, Investigation, Patrol and Fire divisions to be driven home by officers. The greatest distance an officer drove home was 16 miles.

In the past, officers have been allowed to drive the cars home in lieu of receiving a 2.5 percent yearly raise, according to the report. Chief Danny Parker said the town is actually saving money by allowing the use of the vehicles instead of giving raises.

Parker warned the commissioners of potential repercussions, reminding them that Fairmont’s officers are the lowest paid in Robeson County and haven’t received a raise in nearly four years.

“These guys understand the town’s tight budget, but we’ve got some experienced officers and we need to keep them as long as we can,” Parker said. “Because if not, the crime rate’s going to go up because if we bring new officers in, those guys are not familiar with the criminals that are walking the streets … . These guys will have no choice because you’re forcing them to have to seek other employment.”

Parker said all but two of the vehicles are equipped with a GPS system that notifies him if an officer has strayed from his route home.

“Because we did raise the taxes last year, because of the other changes that we’ve made, the other consolidations … I think we’ve done the types of things that demonstrate to the state that we’re doing what we need to do,” Kemp said.

“With Chief Parker’s presentation showing that the town would face some public safety issues that would affect the citizens in a negative way, I wanted to vote to support the public safety department in the face of those potential challenges.”



In other action, the board:

— Accepted a letter from the U.S. Department of Agriculture detailing the conditions of a $385,000 loan from the department for repairs to the sewer system. The $1 million project is being paid for in part by a N.C. Clean Water Management Trust Fund grant of $600,000.

— Considered a plan by Town Manager Linda Vause that calls for Town Clerk Jenny Larson and Public Works Director Ronnie Seals to handle the enforcement of the town’s codes and ordinances.

— Rejected Emmett Sullivan’s bid to purchasee the properties at 319 S. Main St. and 309 S. Main St. for $500 each.

— Heard from Tony Bridgett, executive director of the Dream Academy in Fairmont, who wants to organize several events in town for Easter weekend, including a Good Friday program, an Easter egg hunt and a basketball tournament.



Comments
(2)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
crazystuff
|
January 18, 2012
Stupid move Fairmont concerning the cars. Don't you realize that you have just put the city at GREAT financial risk. If any of the officers or officials get into a wreck while in route to home or to work while in the car that is provided to them then you will be held responsible in a court of law for all damages. This is a fact, you are providing transportation and you are therefore liable. It would be more cost wise to just give the guys a raise. They deserve it!

To the officers driving the cars home:

Don't let the town lie to you. If you get hurt while in that city of Fairmont car going to or coming from work then they are liable for all your damages.

Just goes to show how uninformed some city officials are. Trying to save money and putting themselves at the risk of a huge lawsuit at the same time. Wake up Fairmont, your back door is wide open for a HUGE financial blow up if one of your guys gets into a wreck while in the car that you have provided to them.
JUSTSAYIN21
|
January 18, 2012
HOW COME EVERYTIME THERE IS A TIE BREAKING VOTE ITS ALWAYS 3 BLACK COMMISSIONERS AGAINST THE 3 WHITE COMMISSIONERS? AND ALL THOSE POLICE OFFICERS THAT ARE WORKING FOR NOTHING FOR FAIRMONT OUGHT TO GO SOMEWHERE ELSE FOR MORE MONEY. FAIRMONT DOES NOT TREAT THEIR OFFICERS VERY WELL. THEY ARE DARN GOOD OFFICERS TOO. MAYBE THE CITIZENS OF FAIRMONT SHOULD START POINTING FINGERS AT THE COMMISSIONERS OF THIS TOWN, OBVIOUSLY THE TOWN OF FAIRMONTS PROGRESS IS NOT IN THEIR BEST INTEREST. LAW ENFORCEMENT SHOULD NOT BE AN ISSUE TO CUT COSTS, THATS WHERE THEY SHOULD INCREASE THEM. LOOK FOR CUTS ELSEWHERE. AND IT SOUNDS TO ME AS IF COMMISSIONER MCCREE HAS A PERSONAL AGENDA.
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: