Fatcow Icon
Biodiesel plant defended as no threat to community
by Bob Shiles
Staff writer
Jan 22, 2012 | 5301 views | 17 17 comments | 9 9 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Barbara Collins
Barbara Collins
slideshow
Barbara Collins, left, chats with neighbors about the proposed biodiesel manufacturing facility that would be located near her home. | Bob Shiles | Robesonian
Barbara Collins, left, chats with neighbors about the proposed biodiesel manufacturing facility that would be located near her home. | Bob Shiles | Robesonian
slideshow

PEMBROKE — A proposed biodiesel manufacturing plant that is opposed by some people because of plans to locate it near homes and Purnell Swett High School is being touted as potentially saving the Public Schools of Robeson County up to 75 cents a gallon for fuel.

“Yes, biodiesel is a green energy source, and that’s a positive thing,” said Raymond Cummings, a Robeson County commissioner and Transportation director for the public schools. “But in deciding if a conditional-use permit should be granted for the facility, we (commissioners) have to be sensitive to the feelings of the community. Community harmony is extremely important in the decision-making process.”

Eric T. Locklear has applied for a conditional-use permit to operate the business on about three acres of a 10-acre tract on Kessie Drive. The property, which is owned by Locklear’s family, is adjacent to Purnell Swett High School’s soccer field and about 500 feet from the school building. It also is located only about 100 feet from the back door of the home of Barbara Collins, one of several residents opposing the facility who contend it would be a health and safety hazard.

Biodiesel is produced when methanol and glycerin react with vegetable oil or animal fat. A perusal of websites containing information about biodiesel production provides numerous accounts of fires that have resulted when methanol is not handled properly.

On Thursday, about 30 people met at the West Robeson Methodist Church to develop a plan for convincing county commissioners not to allow the facility on Kessie Drive.

Locklear told The Robesonian that he attended the meeting, but was denied the opportunity to “explain his business.” He said that he did speak with some of those present individually, and that afterward some were more comfortable that the facility would not be as a threat.

“As a finished product, biodiesel is good for the environment,” Collins said last week. “It’s the manufacturing process that we are worried about.”

Collins’ husband Stanley Knick, director of the Native American Resource Center at The University of North Carolina at Pembroke, agreed.

“In the abstract, bio-fuels are a good idea as a replacement for fossil fuels,” he said. “Entrepreneurial ideas for new business start-ups in Robeson County are also a good idea … . However this location … is just not the right place, not the safe place for biodiesel production.

“… Every single company that ever had a chemical fire, that ever had a chemical explosion, that ever had a toxic spill or a gaseous release of any harmful substance swore when they were applying for permits that there was absolutely no danger to human health or the environment, and that nothing bad could ever happen,” Knick said.

In December, the county commissioners denied the permit. Locklear won an appeal to the county’s Zoning Board after providing more information. Locklear is scheduled to go before the commissioners on Feb. 6 to request the conditional-use permit.

Locklear formed Indigenous Bio-Solutions LLC, which employs himself, his wife and his father. The proposal calls for the construction of a 25-foot-by-30-foot building. Traffic to the site would be limited, Locklear said, because the biodiesel would be delivered to customers.

Locklear said that the facility could produce up to 270 gallons of biodiesel a day, but at no time would more than 1,000 gallons be stored at the site. He said the facility would be regulated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources once the sale of fuel begins.

“There are citizens in Robeson County making biodiesel at home right now,” Locklear said. “They don’t sell it, so they don’t need a conditional-use permit.”

Locklear downplayed down the danger.

“Methanol does need to be handled with care, but with no more precautions than you should use when handling gasoline at home or at the gas pump,” he said.

According to the 28-year-old Locklear, he has experience in the fields of chemistry, biology, physics and lab design. He said he has five years of experience as a research and development chemical engineer, more than three years of experience as an environmental scientist, and training and certification in the area of handling hazardous chemicals. He is employed by Porter Scientific in Pembroke, but that company is not involved with Locklear’s biodiesel manufacturing company.

Locklear hopes to see his business grow so he can afford to relocate to an area in Robeson County that is zoned for industrial use. He said he hopes to enter into a contract with the Public Schools of Robeson County to provide biodiesel for the system’s buses, saying it could save the system 50 t0 75 cents a gallon.

Property owners near the proposed manufacturing plant have also raised concerns about what effect the facility could have on property values and a person’s ability to obtain and maintain homeowner’s insurance.

“I have spoken to numerous insurance agents and they all tell me the same thing,” Locklear said. “If equipment is not on a neighbor’s property, it will not affect their homeowner’s insurance.”

Reach staff writer Bob Shiles@910-272-6117 or bshiles@heartlandpublications.com.

Comments
(17)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
tpsreport
|
January 23, 2012
A persons home insurance has nothing to do with with what is on the neighbors property. Anybody that tells you otherwise is not being honest or just does not have a clue.

nokidding
|
January 24, 2012
So if a fireworks factory set up next to my house my insurance rates wouldn't be affected? If neighborhood factors don't impact insurance rates then I wonder why homeowners get lower rates for neighborhoods that have crime watches? I wonder why rates are higher in places that have higher arson rates like Robeson County?
Knick
|
January 24, 2012
tpsreport: Nonsense! According to the Insurance Service Office, a national leading source of information about property/casualty insurance risk, "Obtaining accurate exposure data about adjacent buildings, including exposing walls, hazards, construction, and distance, is critical for underwriters. For instance, a property close to a high-hazard operation or next to a storage tank with flammable liquids can present potential hazards." Anyone who is an insurance field underwriter knows that "potential hazards" equate to either higher homeowner's rates or inability to maintain homeowner's insurance. An insurance agent might tell a prospective client not to worry about such a hazard when trying to sell a policy, but when the national company's field underwriter inspects the property you can be sure that any "hazards" are reported back to the company, and rates are either raised or the policy is denied (depending on whether the "hazard" can be remedied). In this case, there would be no remedy short of moving neighboring houses or moving the biodiesel production facility.
Knick
|
January 23, 2012
USA#1: About methanol: Methanol is extremely flammable, and is capable of causing death by asphyxiation. According to the Wisconsin Department of Health Services, “methanol can form an explosive mixture in air -- at levels as low as 5%...” and it can also “cause burns to the skin and eyes.” The Wisconsin Department of Health Services also reports that the “reproductive and developmental effects of methane are not known.” In other words, the potential effects on growing children in the neighborhood are not known. Should we really gamble with the log range developmental effects on our children and grandchildren?

The applicant’s own document describing the proposed project states with regard to methanol (in Section 8 – Exposure Controls, Personal Protection): that methanol “cannot be made non-poisonous;” and that it is “only very slowly eliminated from the body. Because of this slow elimination, methanol should be regarded as a cumulative poison.” This clearly means that over time the accumulation of small amounts of methanol could have serious long-term health effects. The most vulnerable to this cumulative poisoning effect would be children and the elderly.

About glycerine: Glycerine is clear and odorless, but according to the University of California it can cause irritation of the eyes and skin, and can be flammable and explosive. Over-exposure to glycerine can cause coughing, difficult breathing, headache, nausea, vomiting, convulsions and unconsciousness. The Dow Chemical Company warns that in case of fire involving glycerine the area should be isolated. How could you possibly isolate an open area so close to neighboring residences, just across a fence from a public school athletic field and no more than 3-500 feet from the hundreds of public school students at Purnell Swett High School?

Dow Chemical also warns that at temperatures above 130 degrees (such as in a fire), glycerine decomposes, and that its decomposition products include acrolein, a highly toxic and potentially lethal acrylaldehyde.
USA#1
|
January 23, 2012
If the home insurance rate goes up, then there is a problem with what he is doing. If the insurance rate doesn’t change, then you shouldn't feel concerned. Has anyone submitted information about their home insurance to the Planning / Zoning Board? Seems like if you would do this it would all be over. There is no way they will let him build this if you can prove your home owners insurance will go up. I am the owner of a car garage and a salvage yard. Located less than 10 yards from homes, and 25 yards from a Day Care. My neighbors fought my Conditional Use Permit. They talked about the same things, but their insurance didn't go up. I find it hard to believe that what this young man is doing will cause an increase the neighbors insurance rate. It seems like a small operation. Why is it being called a Plant? 25X30? My garage is 20 times that size.

MDL1968, you are correct. Methanol is considered safer to handle than Gasoline. Much safer as a matter of fact. I just did the research.

UNCP has a Biodiesel Processor on its campus?? I just learned that through research today. Why aren't they screaming about that? Around thousands of student’s everyday.

This guy looks qualified to run this business. He has my support.

Bullard86
|
January 23, 2012
I AGREE WITH U BARBARA 100%. SAFETY IS A BIG ISSUE AN THE ONES WHO THINK DIFFERENT ARE MORE THAN WELCOME TO HAVE IT IN THERE FRONT YARD. IF I HAD MOVED TO A INDUSTRIAL SITE IT WOULDNT BE A PROBLEM, BUT THIS IS A COMMUNITY WHERE CHILDREN PLAY, I DONT WANNA WORRY WHEN MY CHILD GOES OUT TO PLAY,LETS NOT FORGET THE HIGH SCHOOL. DONT THE PARENTS OF THOSE KIDS HAVE A SAY SO? I DONT AGREE WITH IT BESIDE MY HOUSE LET ALONG MY CHILDS SCHOOL WHERE THERE SPENDING MOST OF THE TIME @ DURING THE DAY. WE ALL WORK AN NO I DONT GET ANYTHING FROM THE STATE MIGHT I ADD, I DO PAY TAXES AN I KNOW I HAVE A SAY SO ON WHAT HAPPENING IN MY COMMUNITY. ESPECIALLY IF ITS A DANGER TO MY CHILDREN...... IF THERE WAS ENOUGH MONEY TO GET THIS SO CALLED KIT STARTED, THEN THERE SHOULD HAD BEEN MORE THOUGHT PUT IN ABOUT WHERE IT SHOULD BE LOCATED. IM SORRY MY FAMILY, COMMUNITY AN YES MY PROPERTY AN THE VALUEABLES THAT SIT ON IT IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN A KIT.
BBBD
|
January 22, 2012
Jury's still out for me on biodiesel, but ethanol is a farce.
PointofBeginning
|
January 22, 2012
Guy has a great idea and an opportunity to expand and grow his business and potentially employee more workers, something this county DESPERATELY needs (just look at the headline article). The county would do good to offer this young man a deferred lease building at a safe location and grant money for hiring rather than simply denying the permit.

This is exactly what "made in America" is all about.

Good Luck Eric!!
Knick
|
January 23, 2012
Exactly right! It IS apparently a good idea, and the county should "offer this young man a deferred lease building at a safe location..." Putting it in a residential neighborhood next door to a public school is not safe. But an industrial site or more remote location would be entirely suitable. What America is all about should be the Commissioners doing the right thing and not forcing the neighbors and school to live with ever-present danger, but instead helping Eric get a better, safer location away from homes and schools.
Collinb5
|
January 22, 2012
@MDL1968: Where to begin with your offensive and naive remarks? First, the people who are opposing this facility being placed in a residential/public school zone are hard-working, tax-paying citizens of Robeson County. That you would assume that they are on government assistance reveals more about you than it does about them. The issue has EVERYTHING to do with health and safety of neighbors and their children, and the children who attend the public school immediately adjacent to the proposed facility location. There is also concern for lowered property values and higher insurance rates. The central problem is where to put this potentially dangerous facility. As for your second comment about putting gas in one's car, have you ever put hundreds of gallons of gas in your car, or have you ever produced gasoline in your yard? The analogy to gasoline is pointless. Having gas in one's car also doesn't require methanol and glycerine and the health and safety hazards they entail. Do some research!
USA#1
|
January 23, 2012
I just researched Glycerine and it says its a Soap. Whats the big deal on this? It's in your hand lotion, body wash, and many other ingredients that we put on our body. You can buy 100% pure glycerine at Walmart for $2.98 for skin protectant. The more I read about biodiesel the more I like it. Might just have to make some for myself.

http://www.walmart.com/ip/Humco-Skin-Protectant-Glycerin-Usp-6-oz/10417582

MDL1968
|
January 23, 2012
@Collinb5--

The only way my comment on public assistance would be offensive is if you were on public assistance so thanks for proving my point.

Here are the facts like it or not, admit it or not.

1-60% of this county is on public assistance of some from, that figure is higher in the area in question. So the odds are that at least 6 out of 10 people complaining are recieving assistance.

2-Methanol is safer to produce and handle than the gas you handle on a daily basis. The ingredients being used are in many or the items you utilize or have in your home.

You do your research.
MDL1968
|
January 22, 2012
Has nothing to do with safety, they fear that if a job available that they might actually have to get off their can, give up their governement assistance and go to work.
nokidding
|
January 24, 2012
got you, MDl. If anybody finds your comment offensive or inappropriate then they must be on welfare. I'm in the top 10 percent of Americans when it comes to income. Your remarks are offensive. Oh, but I must be a liberal because I disagree with you. So just go right on feeling entitled to be offensive and shoot off your mouth whenever you like because you are special.
Collinb5
|
January 22, 2012
I am disappointed with your coverage of this story - the health hazards are completely ignored - what we have been researching intensively the last 2 months. We cooperated with this newspaper, providing all the information we could - yet this story was totally slanted toward this "great business for the county."

I had hoped that you would have presented both sides - you didn't - you minimized the potential safety threats and completely disregarded the information about health hazards we provided. Your reporter was given names of other concerned citizens none of which were given the opportunity to express their opposition to this project.

Eric Locklear's own business plan has a section of the hazards of methanol and glycerine in the processing of biodiesel fuel.

What I hoped to see was both sides of this issue and you completely dismissed our side.

We provided copious amounts of documentation about both and health and safety effects of producing biodiesel - and you disregarded that information. For example, Methanol is extremely flammable and explosive and can cause blindness, nerve damage and even death; glycerin can cause vomiting, convulsions and unconsciousness, and in case of fire can decompose and produce acrolein, another potentially deadly chemical.

A quick trip to the EPA or CDC websites would have given you ample information about the poisonous effects of methanol and glycerine. And can you imagine a fire next door to your house with 1000 gallons of fuel?

Again, I naively believed this story would be fair to both sides - it was not.

MDL1968
|
January 22, 2012
gasoline has many of these same effects yet you put it in your tank every day and park the vehicle right in the driveway....just saying....
USA#1
|
January 23, 2012
This was fair to both sides from what I have read. If anything the Robesonian has been more fair to you and the ones who oppose this. From what I see this is the second article you got in the Robesonian this week about how "bad" this thing is. And your still not satisfied? Geez, I see now why this guy is having such a hard time from you. Some people are never satisfied.

Your not the first business owner to have neighbors complain that what your doing will hurt them, and their property. I got my Conditional Use Permit, and I hope you get yours. Good luck young man, you got a big hill to climb with this crowd.
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: