Fatcow Icon
Hate speech
Nov 06, 2012 | 3445 views | 7 7 comments | 9 9 recommendations | email to a friend | print

As this is being written, on Tuesday afternoon with the polls not scheduled to close locally for five more hours, we have only a strong idea of who will win the presidential election, and less than that on most of the other contested races, from governor down to Water and Soil District supervisor.

But we do know that about half the country will be upset with the presidential outcome, and a significant percentage of them will be convinced that the election has been stolen. That is the nature of 50-50 elections. Their outrage will be fueled by what surely has been one of the most contentious presidential races in this nation’s splendid history.

There is nothing groundbreaking about dirty politics.

But the race between President Barack Obama, a Democrat, and challenger Mitt Romney, a Republican and the former governor of Massachusetts, has left a black mark that is unique among this nation’s presidential races: Although this country elected a black man as president four years ago, never has a black man run to be re-elected as president on his four-year record.

That has introduced a troublesome dynamic: Anyone who criticizes the president and his record and who isn’t black is too easily labeled a racist — and that happens far too frequently. See Chris Matthews, who seems to delight in making the charge.

But estimates are about 97 percent of blacks on Tuesday voted for the sitting president — and nary a word is uttered that any of those votes were racially inspired even though they were cast for a president who is basically at odds with fellow blacks on a number of social issues, especially the Big Two, gay marriage and abortion, and that blacks have taken the hardest hit during this troubled economy that is now 4 years old.

We know there were votes cast against President Obama because he was black, and we know there were votes cast for him because he was black. We just don’t know the numbers, but each one was cast for precisely the wrong reason, and without the benefit of thought.

So let’s not close our eyes and pretend we are traveling a one-way street. The hypocrisy should be plain.

The sad and enduring legacy of this election will be that Democrats have accused Republicans of hating blacks, old folks and poor people, and Republicans have accused Democrats of hating hating rich people, whites and Christians.

So here we stand, a nation divided — and the one we deserve.



Comments
(7)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Wolfpackdave
|
November 08, 2012
Ross you are finally right...lets see how many African Americans vote In the next election if the candidate ain't black. My quess half of them that voted wont Next election The article above is TRUE. Sometimes the truth hurts . Tyler perry for 2016. He'll get 300 electoral votes...ha Good luck America. We all gotta strive to do better on our own black ,Mexican,, white, whatever. We get out of the country what we put in.
carolinabluecollar
|
November 08, 2012
Mitt romney didn't just jump into politics a few years ago. This is the same sleezy party that that pocketed huge amounts of bailout money riding george w. Bush's coat tail. Romney was right there getting is spray tanned fingers wet. It'll take a while before americans will forget about that wonderful wall street moment. Anyway I hope ross is loaded cause.....
beachaholic
|
November 07, 2012
Man, you can really tell your artical IS racial. One thing you can say for sure without ANY doubt is that EVERYBOBY, you don't have to guess the numbers, that voted Republican, only voted because he is WHITE. Is that racial?
ROSSisRIGHT
|
November 07, 2012
Only 39% of white people voted for Romney....

97% of blacks voted for Obama...

For YOU this means 61% of whites voted for the black man, and ONLY 3% of blacks voted for the white man, now, what were you saying about "racial"?

This article is correct. Pull your head out of the sand an realize that whites are not racists.

PS. You figure it out, and get back with us.....

ReallyRobeson?
|
November 07, 2012
Back up a bit beach. I voted across party lines for President Obama, Pat McCrory, and G.L.Pridgen because I believe the best can be found in both parties so please refrain from using sweeping generalizations. Sadly, the Republicans will, I believe, become less of a force going forward unless they figure out a way to be more inclusive of different ideas. I also believe that the reason Romney lost has a great deal to do with a snapshot of what the two groups looked like last night; the group in Chicago waiting for the victory speech looked like America in all her magnificent diversity while the group in Massachusetts looked...well, different. My sincere prayer is that as the country tans (whites are heading toward minority status)the new majority will pray for God's wisdom and does unto as wanted not as has been done to. We've got to figure out a way for the feast OR famine to be more equitably shared and stop letting the VERY FEW at the VERY TOP pit the 99% of us against one another for their benefit.
ROSSisRIGHT
|
November 07, 2012
Reallyrobeson: Most of those people at Obamas place lastnite are "the takers"... The ones at Romney's event were "the makers".....

Prove me wrong with statistics.....
SportsJunkie
|
November 08, 2012
The quicker you realize Ross is just a lonely person without a life, you will start to ignore his responses. Surely Ross knows that takers were at both events, but he can't tell you where the givers were. Lets hope the other elected officials in Washington can agree to something, because no one person is responsible for the gridlock.
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: