Animal advocates win 1 concession, miss on heart stick
by Sara Hottman, Staff Writer
4 months ago | 3380 views | 20 20 comments | 32 32 recommendations | email to a friend | print
State Rep. Pat McElraft gets a tour of the Robeson County Animal Shelter from Health Director Bill Smith.
State Rep. Pat McElraft gets a tour of the Robeson County Animal Shelter from Health Director Bill Smith.
slideshow
ST. PAULS — Animal rights advocates on Wednesday met with county officials to discuss several changes they say would improve conditions at the Robeson County Animal Shelter. The county budged on one issue, but declined to commit on euthanasia methods or cleaning products.

State Rep. Pat McElraft and two advocates, Susan Barrett and Faith Walker, called the meeting with Jeff Bass, shelter manager; Bill Smith, director of the Health Department; and Albert Locklear, who oversees its Environmental Health division. A pattern arose during the two-hour meeting: Advocates presented an issue they wanted addressed, and county officials explained why it wasn’t feasible.

Smith granted one concession at the end of the meeting — using softer beds that were donated in kennels with puppies — but dismissed requests to end euthanasia by heart stick or stop using Ajax and Clorox to clean until after the Humane Society of the United States conducts a review of the shelter.

McElraft, a Republican representative for Carteret and Jones counties, is the primary House sponsor for Davie’s Law, a bill that would establish stricter rules for humane euthanasia in animal shelters. The onslaught of activism against Robeson’s shelter over the past month caught her attention.

“I wanted to see for myself what’s going on out here, what’s rumor, what’s fact, what the state legislature can do to help,” McElraft said.

She started the meeting with her main concern: heart-sticking. Robeson’s animal shelter is the only one in the state that still uses heart-sticking as its primary euthanasia method — most counties euthanize intravenously — and McElraft wants the county to stop using the method before her bill bans it.

Barrett said she sent to Gov. Beverly Perdue 10,000 signatures from people who want heart-sticking stopped at Robeson’s shelter.

Smith pointed out that the county is adhering to current state law, which requires shelters to use euthanasia methods approved by the Humane Society, American Veterinary Medical Association, or American Humane Association. Heart-sticking — puncturing an animal’s heart with a needle containing sodium pentobarbital — a fully-sedated animal is permissible by those entities.

“Why is everyone so adamant about keeping the heart stick?” Walker said, adding that intravenous euthanasia is not only the more acceptable method, but also costs less.

Locklear said in a high-kill shelter like Robeson’s, which euthanizes about 4,000 animals a year, heart-sticking is more efficient. Either Bass or James Fletcher, euthanasia technicians, go down a row of kennels and sedate each animal; animals cannot see each other in their pens. Once the animals are fully-sedated, the technician goes down the row and sticks each animal’s heart.

Smith said if the shelter switched to intravenous, it would have to open two hours later because the method — inserting an IV of sodium pentobarbital into an animal’s vein, which takes two employees — is time consuming.

Bass remained silent for much of the meeting, but retaliated against the implication that he heart sticks animals that aren’t sedated: “You’re either going to take me at my word or not; the animal is hard and fast asleep. I do not enjoy doing this. There’s a lot of good animals that never get adopted. ... I wish we were a no-kill shelter, but that’s not possible.”

Several times Barrett asked Smith directly if he would consider dropping the heart stick; he answered indirectly, saying he would wait for the outcome of the Humane Society review.

“If that one thing could be done, that would speak volumes for the shelter, and for you guys too,” Barrett said, alluding to the anger that has been directed toward the men.

The Humane Society shelter review presented another issue: The national organization wants the county to pay for part of the cost, but so far its proposed costs have been too high. Smith said he won’t sign a contract until it’s affordable.

McElraft was surprised the organization wanted payment at all; she felt that could compromise the legitimacy of the review, raising questions about impartiality. She emphasized that she trusts the national Humane Society’s ability to conduct a solid review, and said she would call the organization and try to reduce or eliminate the county’s cost.

Barrett asked the men to switch from harsh cleaning products to veterinarian-grade cleaners. She said she would help get a year’s worth of vet-grade cleaner donated to the shelter and direct Bass to companies that offer it at low cost, though still more expensive than the Ajax and Clorox the shelter currently uses.

She said a dog had been adopted from the shelter with severe chemical burns, likely from cleaning products. State inspectors cited the shelter in March for mixing Ajax and Clorox, creating harsh fumes that caused irritation in dogs’ eyes and noses. Bass said since that citation, shelter workers have not mixed the chemicals.

Barrett said vet-grade cleansers kill diseases and clean kennels as well as the harsher cleansers, but without the sodium hypochlorite base that can cause chemical burns.

Smith and Bass said their procedure — cleaning with Ajax followed by Clorox to kill diseases — is approved by the state.

“If you meet us halfway on three or four things, soft-heartedly switch, these activists would move on to the next shelter,” Barrett said.

“They’d move on to the next issue,” Smith said.

At the end of the meeting, Barrett asked Bass if he had a dog that she was supposed to adopt on behalf of a friend. She said Bass showed her the paperwork that said the dog was sick and had been euthanized that morning.

_________________

Southeastern Veterinary Hospital in Lumberton and Pembroke Veterinary Hospital offer half-price spaying and neutering to animals adopted at the Robeson County Animal Shelter. For more information, contact the shelter at (910) 865-2200.
comments (20)
« Beaglemania wrote on Sunday, Apr 18 at 10:26 AM »
Bottom line..in my opinion...no one at Robeson really cares about the animals in that county except Faith Walker, Susan Barret, Frances Slayton and a few other really good rescue that are fighting for change there. LET'S KEEP UP THE FIGHT GIRLS (AND GUYS). We want leave Robeson until the last Heartsticking, the last jug of bleach/agax is used, the last animal allowed to walk through those doors without being spay/neutered and UNTIL animals that are NOT sick will stop being killed. It is killing...no euthanized...look up the definition. It's KILLING...FLAT OUT KILLING.
« Beaglemania wrote on Sunday, Apr 18 at 10:21 AM »
I do want to Thank Susan and Faith for trying to get changes made there by meeting with the officals. We just have to press harder guys. It is falling on deaf ears. We have to get he heartsticking to end...once and for all. This is the last county in NC doing it....doesn't that speak volumns????? This County needs more funding to run a proper shelter...bottom line. And shame on our government for not budgeting more funds to run a proper shelter instead of a revolving door. What a backwards way of doing things. It just sucks and not having any better experienced shelter staff that AREN'T afraid of the dogs is just horrific. They need kind, loving, caring shelter works that are going to fight to get these dogs adopted out....not tell people on the phone, "We ain't got no beagles here" and I show up 2 hours later and there's the beagle I'm looking for. They are just too busy reading their newspapers and chewing the fat when I go in there to even get up and look at what's in there. I'm discussed with this shelter and will contine to fight until the shelter is shut down or Jeff Bass and his staff is replace with proper, experience workers that aren't afraid of the animals. This stinking not touching the animals with anyting but catch poles around there throats is another sore spot. It's utterly rediculous.
« Beaglemania wrote on Sunday, Apr 18 at 10:14 AM »
Why not stop to ask the question..."Why are they having to kill 4000 pets per year there?" This shelter needs to be modeled after a shelter like Wake Co. Animal Shelter in Raleigh. It cost $120 to adopt a pet $95 more than Robeson. This cost included spay/neuter, shots, deworming, meds if kennel cough or URI,Heartworm testing-and they alot of times have sponser that will pay for the treatment if HW . You can't get a pet from there w/o this being done. They use the lethal injection method of killing unwanted animals. This Robeson county shelter is a revolving door. You adopt a pet for $25, absolutely nothing is done to him/her, not even a rabies unless you pay the extra $8. These Robeson Co. animals are being adopted out to people in exchange for nothing more than $25. They don't even ask for id or what conditions the pet is being adopted under. That same pet comes back a couple months later pregnant and the revolving door starts all over again. The beds is a VERY SMALL victory to say the least. And I believe they are lying when they say they are heartsticking without sedation. TOOOOO MANY PEOPLE HAVE HEARD THE SCREAMS AND SEEN IT HAPPEN. Im my opinion very little was accomplished at this meeting with the officals. We will just have to keep putting pressure on this shelter until they comply with other shelters. I hate it when I hear it's not in the budget to do more humane killings (let's call it what it is). We can send billions of dollars over to other contries when they have disasters but we can't event take care of our own her in america. We live in one screwed up society.
« LetsAdoptUSA wrote on Friday, Apr 16 at 08:33 PM »
The American Veterinary Medical Association guidelines on euthanasia advise against heart stick, known medically as intra-cardiac injection, on animals that are awake.

The AVMA says "Intra-cardiac injection is acceptable only when performed on heavily sedated, anesthetized or comatose animals, owing to the difficulty and unpredictability of performing the injection accurately." This method causes EXCRUCIATING pain!!

---------------------------

Intramuscular injections (sedation) don't cause a dog to scream in bloodcurdling agony! Absolute nonsense.

It's 'heartstick' method used w/out proper medication that will do this.

There is no reason for use of such method at all.

This 'shelter' needs to work on growing its volunteer base, work with local rescues and shelters, hold adoption events and EXTEND its adoption hours to accommodate the public not Mr. Brass' fishing schedule.

All employees of this shelter should have to undergo proper training in animal husbandry. Supervision by an independent agency or citizen humane commission to hold Mr. Brass and staff accountable.

Animal Welfare agencies from around the country, even the globe are monitoring the situation at Robeson County closely.

Take this horrific situation as an example and turn it around to produce something good, Robeson County will be proud to present to the nation. Work on No-Kill and education.

Kind Regards,

Misha Dee

Let's Adopt! USA

http://us.myletsadopt.com

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=205025950458

« VeganWarrior wrote on Friday, Apr 16 at 03:50 PM »
Why is everyone so worried that cleaning the beds might take some time? Every job has demands..besides these "workers" have plenty of time to sit around with their feet up and read the newspaper. What needs to happen is that heart sticking has to end, it's not humane, they need to use vet grade cleaner, they need to extend the 120 hour hold so that these dogs have time to be adopted, there needs to be a spay/neuter program and they need the correct ID and Photo for the correct dog....and you need a NEW crew to help with the changes.

They don't have time, it takes time...well with only 37 dogs and 100 kennels, several staff and some volunteers, WHAT may I ask ARE they doing during the day?

Amazing that there are no kill shelters, shelters that use EBI, have beds, etc.....so why can't Robeson?
« Bullard1 wrote on Friday, Apr 16 at 12:08 PM »
Does Robeson County require spay/neutering of adopted pets from the shelter? If not they should. When I lived in Lumberton many years ago, there was an overpopulation of stray pets etc. I think the time has come for the requirement of a spay/neuter program.
« CommonsenseRox wrote on Friday, Apr 16 at 06:01 AM »
Intracardiac injection is simply a different route of administration of the same drug (sodium pentobarbital) used in IV injection. When the animal is unconscious it is not only humane but the fastest of all methods. All euthanasia technicians are trained in this technique. This route of administration is taught and accepted by both HSUS and the American Humane, along with intraperitoneal and IV injections. The decision of which method to use depends on several factors and should be left up to the technician. The decision is normally based on species, breed, health and temperament. IC injections are used in every shelter in this country depending on the circumstances. Sedation is administered via IM injection and (depending on the drugs used) can be painful, which is probably what the uneducated critics are describing in their accounts. Animals handled in these shelters are not all social and friendly, in fact many are aggressive, unsocialized, or feral. Over restraint, and excess handling is not only stressfull, and inhumane for these animals but can pose serious risks to employees. In addition, there are many times when an IV injection is impossible. Please educate yourselves before commenting on something you know nothing about.
« riverakitas@gmail.com wrote on Friday, Apr 16 at 12:15 AM »
It sounds like it is time to clean house...and not with Alex and bleach. Fire them all and bring in the people who care and will make the relatively simple yet so needed changes. Talk with Nathan Winograd, read the information out there and listen to your citizens...they pay your salaries. Ms. McElraft, listen to your constituents and do what is right, morally right. There are more animal lovers out there that are waking up to what is going on in the local animal control centers...one cannot call them shelters since they do not shelter anything but the government employees doing a substandard job.
« seattledoglover wrote on Friday, Apr 16 at 12:08 AM »
Animal diesease in beds is vet common. Among puppies it almost guaranteed. Sad I say.

To answer Why Mr Bass has this job. Well when I lived in robson county he was the only one that would take it. It has to be A HARD thing to put animals to sleep in any manner and go home at night eat dinner then go to a warm bed. its a tough job for any person no matter if there is some other company watching. Why can't you guys make an animal services and learn from what other places do with animals. Get a vet service that is paid by the state. Write laws that make HEART stick unethical and wrong. Do the work paper work first and not just put a bandaid on it and point fingers. The Robeson county humane society has gone broke trying to do what is right on there own.Now they run a clean staffed shelter that has appropriate rules and regulations. Come take a trip to the ASPCA of dade county florida and see how its done or go to seattle and see how they Treat animals and get the medical treatment they need. LEARN FROM

EXAMPLE! I beg you even Mrs Walker don't just put a bandaid on this PROBLEM fix it the right way. then everyone will be happy and the animals will be in peace with in themselves.

blessing and peace with you all
« PennyPrancerLane wrote on Friday, Apr 16 at 12:03 AM »
This makes me sick to my stomach. This place sounds so truly evil. Why are they doing this to these animals. How can anybody bring themselves to kill animals via heartstick. It sounds like this man Jeff Bass needs to be shown the door! As long as he advocates for the heartstick method, using horrible chemicals to clean, as well as remaining a so-called shelter that KILLS, these animals don't stand a chance!
« doggies4me wrote on Thursday, Apr 15 at 10:03 PM »
robcoreader--- If other shelters do it, why can't Robeson County Shelter do it? I was at the shelter, a couple weeks ago where a mother dog, with a number of puppies, was laying on a cold cement floor, puppies (eyes not yet opened) were crawling around on the cold cement floor... it was heartbreaking. One small comfort for these poor helpless creatures would have been a bed, for the puppies.... is that so difficult. Like I said, other shelters do it, why can't Robeson?
« buddycritter wrote on Thursday, Apr 15 at 09:19 PM »
What's funny to me is that they are so concerned about these cages being clean. Like it matters when they kill torture and kill animals there everyday with 50 or more cages sitting empty. The animals receive no vet care or any medical attention whatsoever. If the animals have 120 hours to live before they are stuck in the heart wouldn't your main concern be trying to get them adopted?

Why are they still trying to work with the same parasitic staff and expect anything to change. In order to correct the horror that goes on there you have to remove the source of it first.
« juli28428 wrote on Thursday, Apr 15 at 09:05 PM »
I think this is terribly sick. It will be a cold day in hell before I ever spend another dime in your county and I'm not the only one who feels this way. Don't you people know that folks from all over the world are negatively discussing Robeson County and Jeff Bass? You sure put a black eye on NC.
« sfarley wrote on Thursday, Apr 15 at 08:24 PM »
Re: Soft Beds...yes the beds will definitely need to be cleaned to prevent disease. I believe the ones that were sent there are made of vinyl and could easily be cleaned at the same time as the floors. Maybe if they put a little more effort into being rescue-friendly and helping to get the animals adopted they wouldn't have all the animal activists up in arms over the mistreatment there!!!!! Instead it appears that they're intentionally lying and being very difficult to deal with when rescues try to save the dogs and cats. Not to mention all the mysterious injuries that a lot of the dogs and cats there have. Hmmmmm, it appears that there is more here than meets the eye.....eventually someone with authority WILL do something about it...it's just a matter of time...
« LetsAdoptUSA wrote on Thursday, Apr 15 at 08:02 PM »
Mister Brass needs to be stopped. He treats this "shelter" as his kingdom and animals suffer abuse. Plain and simple. Of course the stories are true. So many different accounts of animals trembling in fear, defecating on themselves just at the sight of this man. The way he handles dogs, by scruffing them right in front of visitors.

Unbelievable. How did this person qualify for the position as a shelter manager?

It is bad enough that we have become a throw-away society that treats pets as disposable toys. While it is clear that a municipal shelter doesn't have a magic wand to find a home for each and every animal surrendered to them. There is a responsibility to these animals to treat them with respect and humanely.

There is no reason to use cheap bleach, as there are effective cleaners specifically for shelter environments.

Finally, The shelter should be supervised by an independent agency.

Various accounts of unnecessary killings with only 30 of over 100 kennels occupied. The screams of dogs heard. Blood curdling screams - not likely from being treated humanely. Very likely the screams are a result from having a needle rammed into their heart!

This clearly doesn't fit in with the picture Mister Brass is trying to paint.

Instead of shortening visiting hours and making the shelter even less accessible to potential adopters - the shelter needs to extend its hours and work closely with local rescues and shelters to find homes for their animals. It is also the county's responsibility to promote spaying and neutering in your community.

How about a month of free/low cost s/n twice a year?

There's a start...

Kind Regards,

Misha Dee

Let's Adopt! USA

http://us.myletsadopt.com

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=205025950458

« 52roses wrote on Thursday, Apr 15 at 07:39 PM »
If it`s cheaper Smith would sign it right? if a different way of putting these animals to sleep is cheaper WHY NOT?? Time consuming? come on MR> BASS What is this guys problem??!! you have to wonder ya know? AND IF these dogs are fully sedated why are they screaming in pain so loudly you can hear them outside of the building? Please someone explain this to the public please?OR is he going to say that is a lie also? you can call people lier`s for so long BEFORE the truth comes to light.And Why is he being so difficult about EVERYTHING,that says something about him and or that shelter and what goes on,why are the animals put down while people are waiting to adopt them? I mean come on!! how much longer do you really think this is going to be allowed to continue?? and what makes him or who ever? think They are above the law?n how long before they WILL be caught w/pants down if it is not fixed NOW!!SOONER OR LATER IT WILL HAPPEN!
« jackie57 wrote on Thursday, Apr 15 at 03:53 PM »
I was at shelter all day on Tuesday the 13th and I did not see any sick dogs.Being a nurse for 30 years and having animals all my life I think I would know if an animal was sick or not. Thirty two animals and a hundred cages and they put some of them to sleep while there were people outside shelter door wanting to save these animals. I also heard about the terrible screams they heard coming from those animals while they were being put to sleep. These sources are highly reliable. Why were they not let in and why did any animals have to be put down at all with so many empty cages?
« concernedinILM wrote on Thursday, Apr 15 at 03:16 PM »
Rob,

A great majority of other shelters throughout the US use these beds with no problem, including many in this state. If there's no issue for them, then why would it be for Robeson? Unless they're too lazy to do their jobs....
« NOHEART wrote on Thursday, Apr 15 at 03:07 PM »
I saw the video of animals being murdered by the heartstick method. This video was from Robeson, and portrayed heartless people dragging dogs and cats picking them up by the neck and puncturing the chest of each animal. Then throwing them into a waste can on top of live and dead animals. This included two puppies roaming among the top of the pile till they were grabbed up and killed. As long as the heartstick method is used, I will consider NC off limits.
« robcoreader wrote on Thursday, Apr 15 at 12:51 PM »
Re: Soft beds for puppies - They could become breeding grounds for all the fun puppy diseases that the unvaccinated puppies will bring with them to the shelter. Either they will have to be changed with each litter (expensive), washed with bleach in between each use (time consuming), or left as is (stupid). Which will it be?
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

featured businesses
Gasoline Prices
Sponsored By:

Recipes
Sponsored By: