Jury: Pork giant must pay $473.5M

By: By Alex Derosier - and Emery P. Dalesio
Rouzer
Gavin

RALEIGH — A federal jury decided Friday that the world’s largest pork producer should pay $473.5 million to neighbors of three North Carolina industrial-scale hog farms for unreasonable nuisances they suffered from odors, flies and rumbling trucks.

The jury found that Smithfield Foods owes compensation to six neighbors who complained in their lawsuit that the company failed to stop “the obnoxious, recurrent odors and other causes of nuisance” resulting from closely packed hogs, which “generate many times more sewage than entire towns.”

The jury awarded $23.5 million in compensatory damages and $450 million in punitive damages, which will be reduced to a total of $94 million under limits in state law.

The case comes after two previous, related lawsuits rocked agribusiness in the country’s No. 2 pork-producing state. Juries in those two cases awarded damages of about $75 million intended to punish Smithfield, though those amounts also were required to be cut.

Smithfield operates a plant in Tar Heel that employs more than 5,000 people and processes more than 30,000 hogs a day.

North Carolina legislators reacted by adopting new barriers against nuisance lawsuits that all but eliminate the ability of neighbors to sue Smithfield Foods or any other agribusiness. Critics billed the legislation as an attack on private property rights in order to protect a well-heeled industry.

U.S. Sen Thom Tillis and U.S. Rep. David Rouzer suggested they might seek national legislation after hearing Friday from agribusiness executives and agriculture officials from North Carolina, Georgia, Delaware and Texas in Raleigh.

“Today’s nuisance lawsuits that are destroying livelihoods and communities in North Carolina are the tip of the iceberg for what is to come absent a well-informed public and good public policy,” Rouzer said in a prepared statement Thursday. “This is a very slippery slope that threatens the very existence of every form of agriculture nationwide.”

Industry group the North Carolina Pork Council decried the jury’s decision in a statement warning that it could lead to more lawsuits across the country. ‘

“This verdict will spread from eastern North Carolina to all corners of American agriculture,” the group said, calling for an appeal of the decision they described as unfair and unjust.

Robeson County could be in the line of fire.

Robeson County ranks sixth among counties in North Carolina in hog production, with a population of about 340,000 in 2017.

State Sen. Danny Britt, who represents Robeson and Columbus counties, warned about what the verdict could mean not only for hog farmers, but for the agriculture industry.

“The brunt impact of these lawsuits will be felt by these family owned farms,” said Britt, who is a lawyer by profession. “However if this spread to other agricultural interests such as poultry then the corn and grain farmers would also suffer as well. Hog production is an $11 billion business in North Carolina, creating more than 46,000 jobs.

“I am certain if we lost our other agribusiness as we did tobacco we would be rolling up the sidewalks in eastern North Carolina. Additionally, this isn’t about water pollution or other negligence actions as they would still be liable for those. These suits are about odors, flies and the rumbling noise of trucks. These are good hard working families who have not violated a single federal or state environmental law.”

Britt said he and fellow Republicans are trying to protect farmers.

“Myself along with other members of the majority party have passed legislation to significantly limit the possibility of this type of lawsuit and verdict in the future,” he said. “The governor and his party did not support our bill, the governor vetoed the bill and his party voted with him to sustain the veto. Thankfully for all farm families we had the numbers to override his veto and to protect farm families.”

Environmental advocates said there’s good reason pork producers have been getting hit with penalties.

“These juries are repeatedly seeing problems with the kind of waste management that’s used,” said Cassie Gavin, a lobbyist with the North Carolina Sierra Club. “Clearly it’s time for the state and the industry to take a hard look at their waste management and modernize it so the public is protected.”

The Pender County, North Carolina, farms at the center of the lawsuit held thousands of hogs owned by a Smithfield Foods subsidiary. Smithfield was sued because plaintiffs’ lawyers said the company used strict contracts to dictate how farmers raised Smithfield’s animals.

One neighbor who was not part of the suit compared the waste stench to long-dead corpses he found during his career as a police officer and firefighter, news outlets reported. Wesley Sewell testified that he bought his house out of foreclosure without realizing the hog operations were nearby and sometimes fled to another home when the smells were too strong.

Lawyers for the neighbors said Smithfield hasn’t taken measures that would minimize the nuisances, for example by sending trucks along a back road to pick up hogs for slaughter in the middle of the night instead of rumbling past sleeping homes. Nor has the company covered the waste pits or otherwise tried to capture the smell and bacteria resulting from pooling liquefied waste, lawyers for the neighbors said. The company has done that in Missouri and Colorado, attorneys said.

The predominant method of handling hog waste in North Carolina is collecting it in open-air pits that are emptied by spraying liquid excrement on farm fields. The method was banned at new livestock operations in 1997, when industrial-scale hog operations began to be planned near the Pinehurst golf resort two years before it would host the U.S. Open tournament.

Smithfield has continued using the low-cost method because it helps the company produce pork for less than in China, lawyers for the neighbors said. Smithfield is owned by Hong Kong-headquartered WH Group, which posted profits of about $1 billion last year.

Rouzer
https://www.robesonian.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/web1_Rouzer_1-1.jpgRouzer

Gavin
https://www.robesonian.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/web1_Gavin_1-1.jpgGavin

https://www.robesonian.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/web1_Britt_1.jpg
Says farms are ‘nuisance’ to nearby neighbors

By Alex Derosier

and Emery P. Dalesio

The Robesonian contributed to this story.

The Robesonian contributed to this story.