RALEIGH — The first day of the two-week filing period for state and county elections began with a North Carolina appeals court suspending candidate filing for U.S. House and state legislative.

The order was made Monday while judges there considered whether to block the use of district boundaries that lawsuit filers claim are illegal partisan gerrymanders.

With minimal advance warning for candidates and state elections officials, a Court of Appeals order directed state and local officials not to begin accepting candidates for those seats, which was supposed to begin at noon. Filing for other positions — including U.S. Senate, judicial seats and city and county positions — began as scheduled in Raleigh and at county election offices in all 100 counties.

The decision means candidates seeking to file as soon as they could for 170 General Assembly and 14 U.S. House seats up for election in 2022 had to be turned away. Congressional hopefuls who want to file in person must do so in Raleigh.

“There were some congressional candidates particularly that (were) caught off guard because some of them have traveled obviously across the state to get here today to be ready for filing,” State Board of Elections Executive Director Karen Brinson Bell said in an interview.

Bell’s office cited U.S. Rep. Alma Adams, who represents the Charlotte area, as the most prominent candidate turned away from the candidate filing at the State Fairgrounds in Raleigh.

The order has little to no effect on the filing proceedings at the Robeson County Board of Elections, said Tina Bledsoe, the office’s director. Congressional candidates are required to file with the State Board of Elections in Raleigh and information is then forwarded to the local office, Bledsoe said.

Bledsoe said if the election is postponed, that would definitely effect the local board.

“It depends on how long they delay,” Bledsoe said. “If they delay it too long we might have to hold another election or file theirs separate. We’ll just see how this turns out.”

The chair of the Robeson County Democratic Party said she hoped for a speedy resolution to issue.

“Although there are mixed feelings and responses about the lines, I would hope that a fair agreement can be reached quickly to allow time to organize the best possible teams and candidates.” Karen Nance said.

G.L Pridgen, chair of the local Republican Party, said he had heard of the order but has yet to read it.

“[W]hile the court is taking time to look at the new election maps, we are confident that they will be found to be fair and legal. This redistricting process has been the most transparent in many decades.”

The chair of the N.C. Democratic Party Chair Bobbie Richardson championed the court order.

“Today’s decision to delay the start of candidate filings is an important step towards ensuring that North Carolina voters aren’t represented by unconstitutional, partisanly gerrymandered maps. Voters should be able to select the individuals that represent them, not the other way around,” Richardson wrote in a statement.

“As our state continues to grow and transform, it is critical that the district maps reflect the diversity of our state. I am hopeful that North Carolinians will eventually vote on fair and transparent maps, and celebrate the Democrats across the state who stand ready to declare their candidacy following this decision.”

The temporary stay was sought by and granted to the plaintiffs in a lawsuit led by the North Carolina League of Conservation Voters. They allege the maps approved by the Republican-controlled General Assembly are unlawfully designed to secure GOP control of the legislature and for the party to win at least 10 of the state’s 14 U.S. House seats. A panel of three trial judges refused Friday the plaintiffs’ requests to block elections from occurring under the plans.

The league’s attorneys, in asking for the temporary delay earlier Monday, told the appeals court there would be “needless waste and inconvenience” should candidates file in what they consider “unlawfully drawn districts.”

“Needless aggravation may ensue if the state board must throw out existing candidacies and start over,” they wrote.

The order of the intermediate-level appeals court told lawyers for Republican legislative leaders and the state to respond to the league’s arguments by midday Thursday. The candidate filing period for the March 8 primary is supposed to continue through noon Dec. 17. The league wants the primary date pushed backed to May.

League Executive Director Carrie Clark said she was pleased with the ruling: “There is more work ahead to get these maps overturned and fair maps adopted, and we will continue to fight to protect our democracy.”

Republican legislative leaders have said the maps were lawfully drawn. Their lawyers told judges last week that while no political data was entered into mapmaking computers the General Assembly used, they also said state Supreme Court precedent allows the General Assembly to consider “partisan advantage” in drawing districts.

Bell said Board of Elections attorneys learned about the delay at 11:27 a.m., just 33 minutes ahead of the noon opening.

She added that candidate filing could be delayed a few days beyond the current Dec. 17 end date and keep the primary date in place, but not much more.

“We don’t have a lot of time for give or take on these dates,” Bell said, but “whatever they come up with, we’ll make it happen.”

Redistricting litigation forced some or all of the state’s primaries to be delayed many times, including in 2002, 2004 and 2016.